I dont think Ferrari are either, sheer power kept them ahead. But considering that the McLaren is based on aerodynamic efficiency you'd think that the the straights here would tip the favour towards mcl over Renault, but they didn't.
I dont think Ferrari are either, sheer power kept them ahead. But considering that the McLaren is based on aerodynamic efficiency you'd think that the the straights here would tip the favour towards mcl over Renault, but they didn't.
I guess we will never know how good the car could have been... Carlos’ Race was compromised in lap 4 and couldn’t show his actual pace through the race while trying to conserve his tires... And Lando’s Race was over at the beginning of the race too.mwillems wrote:I dont think Ferrari are either, sheer power kept them ahead. But considering that the McLaren is based on aerodynamic efficiency you'd think that the the straights here would tip the favour towards mcl over Renault, but they didn't.
I dont think it matters alot. Look what happened in Canada, where track suits us. Anyway, both cars had a problem with brakes. It cant be a coincidence, even if Sainz only had some debris. We lost double points score for brake problems.
French track is limited in front? It seems that this is not very suitable for our chassis.chrisgr wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:09I dont think it matters alot. Look what happened in Canada, where track suits us. Anyway, both cars had a problem with brakes. It cant be a coincidence, even if Sainz only had some debris. We lost double points score for brake problems.
edit: Because Paul Ricard is Renault's home race, I suppose they will bring a lot of updates. Mclaren is a (marginally) better car all around until now but things can change easily.
I'm not sure anyone has looked at mechanical failures / issues and blamed the drivers, it's just you putting that out there I think, but if it suits you're narrative then i dont mindAndres125sx wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:21So brakes problems on both cars, presumably both due to debris blocking air intakes, compromised Carlos race forcing to do 67 laps on same tires, and melting Lando suspension. It´s a shame since McLaren was performing really well this weekend
Some will say drivers did underperform again tough
It's quite front limited indeed. Sort of like Barcelona. Judging by the pattern so far the performance will probably be quite bad. Renault is bringing a substantial upgrade as well while still being a bit ahead on pace currently, so the outlook looks bleak in terms of pace._cerber1 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:34French track is limited in front? It seems that this is not very suitable for our chassis.chrisgr wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:09I dont think it matters alot. Look what happened in Canada, where track suits us. Anyway, both cars had a problem with brakes. It cant be a coincidence, even if Sainz only had some debris. We lost double points score for brake problems.
edit: Because Paul Ricard is Renault's home race, I suppose they will bring a lot of updates. Mclaren is a (marginally) better car all around until now but things can change easily.
They had production issues, otherwise the upgrade was scheduled for earlier. As for Mclaren, that's the second new floor in only 2 races so they're on it.
Its front limited in the final 3 curves which are long and low speed. All other corners have relatively fast entries, save the slowest turn which leads onto the back straight._cerber1 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:34French track is limited in front? It seems that this is not very suitable for our chassis.chrisgr wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:09I dont think it matters alot. Look what happened in Canada, where track suits us. Anyway, both cars had a problem with brakes. It cant be a coincidence, even if Sainz only had some debris. We lost double points score for brake problems.
edit: Because Paul Ricard is Renault's home race, I suppose they will bring a lot of updates. Mclaren is a (marginally) better car all around until now but things can change easily.
Alonso was a DNF at Paul Ricard last year.godlameroso wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 16:56Its front limited in the final 3 curves which are long and low speed. All other corners have relatively fast entries, save the slowest turn which leads onto the back straight._cerber1 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:34French track is limited in front? It seems that this is not very suitable for our chassis.chrisgr wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:09
I dont think it matters alot. Look what happened in Canada, where track suits us. Anyway, both cars had a problem with brakes. It cant be a coincidence, even if Sainz only had some debris. We lost double points score for brake problems.
edit: Because Paul Ricard is Renault's home race, I suppose they will bring a lot of updates. Mclaren is a (marginally) better car all around until now but things can change easily.
Alonso managed to score points there last year. They can do it again with a trouble free weekend. The car is fast enough to finish every race in the points, and getting better every round. There are still costly operational errors holding them back.
It all depends on how accurate some of the speeds are. It isn't clear to me if McLaren are front end limited at slow speeds and not so much at high speed.M840TR wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 14:06It's quite front limited indeed. Sort of like Barcelona. Judging by the pattern so far the performance will probably be quite bad. Renault is bringing a substantial upgrade as well while still being a bit ahead on pace currently, so the outlook looks bleak in terms of pace._cerber1 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:34French track is limited in front? It seems that this is not very suitable for our chassis.chrisgr wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:09
I dont think it matters alot. Look what happened in Canada, where track suits us. Anyway, both cars had a problem with brakes. It cant be a coincidence, even if Sainz only had some debris. We lost double points score for brake problems.
edit: Because Paul Ricard is Renault's home race, I suppose they will bring a lot of updates. Mclaren is a (marginally) better car all around until now but things can change easily.
Wait, no...godlameroso wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 16:56Its front limited in the final 3 curves which are long and low speed. All other corners have relatively fast entries, save the slowest turn which leads onto the back straight._cerber1 wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:34French track is limited in front? It seems that this is not very suitable for our chassis.chrisgr wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 08:09
I dont think it matters alot. Look what happened in Canada, where track suits us. Anyway, both cars had a problem with brakes. It cant be a coincidence, even if Sainz only had some debris. We lost double points score for brake problems.
edit: Because Paul Ricard is Renault's home race, I suppose they will bring a lot of updates. Mclaren is a (marginally) better car all around until now but things can change easily.
Alonso managed to score points there last year. They can do it again with a trouble free weekend. The car is fast enough to finish every race in the points, and getting better every round. There are still costly operational errors holding them back.
Understeer mostly hits at high entry speed, doesn't matter if the corner is slow or fast.diffuser wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 19:35It all depends on how accurate some of the speeds are. It isn't clear to me if McLaren are front end limited at slow speeds and not so much at high speed.M840TR wrote: ↑10 Jun 2019, 14:06It's quite front limited indeed. Sort of like Barcelona. Judging by the pattern so far the performance will probably be quite bad. Renault is bringing a substantial upgrade as well while still being a bit ahead on pace currently, so the outlook looks bleak in terms of pace.
There was talk about removing turns 8 and 9 from the 2019 configuration last year.
https://cdn-1.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... ck-map.jpg