Good point its test session IMOCouncilorIrissa wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 21:05They restarted the engine to fix the issue. Retiring the car does not make sense since they still need the data in wet conditions to fix the car's problems.
Good point its test session IMOCouncilorIrissa wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 21:05They restarted the engine to fix the issue. Retiring the car does not make sense since they still need the data in wet conditions to fix the car's problems.
Fans needs answer what in h… happend in Canada? It is complete meltdown of the team, strategi, pace of the car. Complete disaster. Something happend with pace of the car, it was soooo slowwww.dia6olo wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 21:34Shocking weekend!
$hit happens and based on the season so far, for the most part that's all it is.
That said, car has got a big problem in both cool and changing conditions, I hope they get it sorted in double quick time because now the gaps have closed up it's becoming very costly!
Agreed, better to have all the issues at once. Car is really not suited to cold or wet tracks for an undiscovered reason. Best all round car is now the McLaren imo, but verstappen gives rbr the edge. Watch Ferrari have a car suited for high track temps have rainy weekends all year now
Everything that's happened is easily explained by what we know about the car's characteristics.Fer.Fan wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 21:41Fans needs answer what in h… happend in Canada? It is complete meltdown of the team, strategi, pace of the car. Complete disaster. Something happend with pace of the car, it was soooo slowwww.dia6olo wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 21:34Shocking weekend!
$hit happens and based on the season so far, for the most part that's all it is.
That said, car has got a big problem in both cool and changing conditions, I hope they get it sorted in double quick time because now the gaps have closed up it's becoming very costly!
It can not explain the fact Ferrari ware slower the mid teams. Not even top ten during the race. This was team set up disaster. Just look at Ferraris low DF rear wing, they put way to little DF on the car. Thats why they ware so slow. Just compare rear wings of RB, MB and Mclaren.CouncilorIrissa wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 21:46Everything that's happened is easily explained by what we know about the car's characteristics.Fer.Fan wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 21:41Fans needs answer what in h… happend in Canada? It is complete meltdown of the team, strategi, pace of the car. Complete disaster. Something happend with pace of the car, it was soooo slowwww.dia6olo wrote: ↑09 Jun 2024, 21:34Shocking weekend!
$hit happens and based on the season so far, for the most part that's all it is.
That said, car has got a big problem in both cool and changing conditions, I hope they get it sorted in double quick time because now the gaps have closed up it's becoming very costly!
It was designed to put as little heat into the tyres as possible in order to fix the issues of its predecessor -- overheating that caused poor race pace. CGV as a circuit has no high-speed corners and a lot of straights, meaning that the cars that put less energy into the tyres suffer the most, as they simply can't keep the heat in the tyres. It's why the SF23 was good around this circuit and it's why the RB19 was vulnerable -- because of that very characteristic.
Now combine this with low temperatures, a chaotic weekend plagued by brake and PU issues you have the perfect storm for such a situation to happen. No strategy could've ever salvaged this.