It's seperate ... it's all a bit of a confusing mess as well.
23.2b) is the number of places they have to drop for PU elementsc) Once the grid has been established in accordance with a) and b) above, grid position penalties will be applied to the drivers in question in the order the offences were committed. If, following the qualifying practice session, more than one driver incurs a penalty under Article 23.2b) or Article 23.4a) preference will be given to the driver whose Competitor first informed the Technical Delegate that a power unit or gearbox change will be carried out.
d) Any driver required to start the race from the back of the grid after incurring a penalty
under Article 23.2b) will be arranged on the grid behind any driver penalised under c)
above.
If more than one driver is required to start the race from the back of the grid they will be
arranged in qualifying order
It's funny, because as an impartial fan, I see just as many people suggesting FIA-Merc conspiracy theories!!
So it'd be Vestappen (+5) 7th, Bottas (+3) 6th, Sainz (+3) 10th.RZS10 wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021, 22:30It's seperate ... it's all a bit of a confusing mess as well.
Check sporting regs 36.3 on page 39
23.2b) is the number of places they have to drop for PU elementsc) Once the grid has been established in accordance with a) and b) above, grid position penalties will be applied to the drivers in question in the order the offences were committed. If, following the qualifying practice session, more than one driver incurs a penalty under Article 23.2b) or Article 23.4a) preference will be given to the driver whose Competitor first informed the Technical Delegate that a power unit or gearbox change will be carried out.
d) Any driver required to start the race from the back of the grid after incurring a penalty
under Article 23.23b) will be arranged on the grid behind any driver penalised under c)
above.
If more than one driver is required to start the race from the back of the grid they will be
arranged in qualifying order
23.4a) is gearboxes
I love all these conspiracy theories. Keep em coming please, I can have a new foil hat for Christmas thenadrianjordan wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021, 22:31It's funny, because as an impartial fan, I see just as many people suggesting FIA-Merc conspiracy theories!!
I mostly see the Mercedes performance/aero/engine conspiracies, on the other hand, the thread is flooded with posts insinuating that Mercedes is the underdog being punished unfairly but the FIA tyrants who are reluctant to punish Red Bull.adrianjordan wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021, 22:31It's funny, because as an impartial fan, I see just as many people suggesting FIA-Merc conspiracy theories!!
haha love it
Yea. If they penalize them.
lol
According to Fabrega, Hamilton didn’t use the Brazil engine in QatarHammerfist wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021, 17:19You realize the ICE change comes with a change in power mode too right? This engine is optimized for the last 4 races. it is obviously what is going on. It is running closer to party mode right now. Maybe Redbull and Honda should have done the same thing. Otherwise, it is likely check mate for Mercedes. Hamilton looks untouchable right now.Michelangelo wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021, 17:14It is crazy how it transformed from “they’re too quick” to a gap of 4.5 tenths in two weeks. It can’t be just an ICE change.
The marshall in the vicinity had his/her own ideas and was waving away.