Their target was no higher than P6. Once Norris was comfortably ahead and Gasly was kept at bay, it was all about managing tyres and saving engine life. So, he was driving to a delta till the end, instead of going for P5, which he couldn't have got anyways. If they have a an upgrade or two that would enable them to challenge for a higher position, I am sure they would go for it.Artur Craft wrote: ↑02 Jul 2019, 04:52Mclaren improved and is the clear 4th carbut there is an abyss to the top 3 as they still get lapped
I rate both drivers very highly, they are doing a great job and with a better car I am sure they would deliver.Jambier wrote: ↑02 Jul 2019, 09:30Very Very pleased with what the team is doing.
Results are here, drivers are not top drivers, but are OK for what they do now, Lando is progressing and still have more to show in the futur.
Team is not arrogant anymore, Seidl, Key, recruitement are promising! It's a long road but McLaren seems to finally be in the right way to recover !
Yeah. It was pretty mind boggling. They would ignore testing results, do no further analysis and just go on claiming that McLaren is 9th, almost certainly as they based their opinion on last year results.
AgreedFittingMechanics wrote: ↑02 Jul 2019, 11:29Yeah. It was pretty mind boggling. They would ignore testing results, do no further analysis and just go on claiming that McLaren is 9th, almost certainly as they based their opinion on last year results.
But when someone took the time to analyze the data (https://f1metrics.wordpress.com/2019/03 ... -analysis/), and do statistic based analysis, he came up with this.
https://f1metrics.files.wordpress.com/2 ... .png?w=640
As you can see, the analysis is pretty much spot on. Only major mistake is that Ferrari is ahead of Mercedes, but given known Mercedes sand bagging tactics it's not that unexpected.
He even got the Haas unpredictability right! Imagine if journalists did their job and did proper analysis.
The funny thing is, there was nothing in pre-season to suggest that they were 2nd slowest. When McLaren set a quick time, it's a glory run, when another team does, it's "serious pace"... But I'm really glad McLaren didn't go out of their way to dispute any of the nonsense talk, they just carried on with their business
Fair enoughdiffuser wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 14:39Agreed...in the keep him honest department...he did make a mistake that broke his front wing and cost him one(Gasly) position.Andres125sx wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 13:42
Not sure if this is a good thing but he had to pass all 11 cars on track, nothing from pitstops. Anycase going from last to best of the rest was more than expected, so awesome job to the whole team, but this time specially Carlos
So perfection, no, but very good.
Well I hope for the rest of the season, for our self interest of course!Andres125sx wrote: ↑02 Jul 2019, 13:02Fair enoughdiffuser wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 14:39Agreed...in the keep him honest department...he did make a mistake that broke his front wing and cost him one(Gasly) position.Andres125sx wrote: ↑01 Jul 2019, 13:42
Not sure if this is a good thing but he had to pass all 11 cars on track, nothing from pitstops. Anycase going from last to best of the rest was more than expected, so awesome job to the whole team, but this time specially Carlos
So perfection, no, but very good.
I wonder for how many races Gasly will keep his seat...
MakAsp wrote: ↑02 Jul 2019, 13:40What's the view on the uprated engine in Sainz car - he looked half a second quicker per lap than Norris on clearer laps? He also set one of the quickest times of the day in that middle stint - That would put McLaren within touching distance of the boys ahead if an accurate reflection ( stretching hope I know...)
Was similar to the difference between Ricciardo and Hulkenburg at the French GP so looks like a genuine pace increase?