2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
Vettel165
4
Joined: 06 Apr 2018, 20:46
Location: Maribor/Slovenia

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

pantherxxx wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 20:06
Austin upgrades will work. Red Bull will win all remaining 6 races. Mark my words.
If it happens it would be the biggest miracle of the year. [-o<

Rikhart
Rikhart
19
Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 20:21

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 09:16
langedweil wrote:I've got the feeling that an AMR announcement isn't really far away.
Newey and Honda .. can't even really imagine Ver driving for RB next year.
Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 16:57
Red Bull is losing key personnel at the same time that it is losing the WCC and, in the worst-case scenario, the WDC. If this is not meaning of falling apart, I don't know what is. The next big thing might be Max if he is leaving.
Next year might be too soon. Alonso is still there with a contract until the end of 2026. And I'm not sure what Verstappen thinks of Lance being on the team. Will Lawrence let Max drive for the championship?
Let? Do you really think Stroll would be anywhere near Verstappen? Maybe if they added 50 kgs of ballast that could happen!

User avatar
AeroDynamic
349
Joined: 28 Sep 2021, 12:25
Location: La règle du jeu

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

organic wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 22:42
AeroDynamic wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 22:09
How long can Horner remain? Several high profile red bull people have chose to leave the team within a span of a few months, while they were just beginning to enjoy a dominance cycle. Jos predicted this.
He has the backing of the Thai ownership. If they removed him now they'd be admitting defeat against the Austrian side of rb. Wheatley, who was the most obvious replacement, has already left so perhaps that ship has sailed
The Thai ‘leadership’ lack credibility to understand the business. Horner staying has clearly unsettled and disrupted a great team of people. He was more replaceable than those that left.

Horner, if he puts the team first, doesn’t need the Thai ownership to give him consent to stand down. I’m sure he understands the only benefit in him keeping the position, is to serve himself. It is not serving the team’s best interest. When Wheatley was there, it was obvious to anyone from the outside what strength and depth the team has to take over his responsibilities but he’s chosen himself over the team.

User avatar
Jurgen von Diaz
0
Joined: 11 Feb 2024, 18:38

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post


Rikhart wrote:
Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 09:16
langedweil wrote:I've got the feeling that an AMR announcement isn't really far away.
Newey and Honda .. can't even really imagine Ver driving for RB next year.
Next year might be too soon. Alonso is still there with a contract until the end of 2026. And I'm not sure what Verstappen thinks of Lance being on the team. Will Lawrence let Max drive for the championship?
Let? Do you really think Stroll would be anywhere near Verstappen? Maybe if they added 50 kgs of ballast that could happen!
Of course, Lance wouldn't keep up with Max's pace, but if the car is dominant, anything is possible. For now, sabotaging Alonso won't benefit the team because they aren't fighting for wins, but when it comes down to a championship fight, I can imagine that Lawrence wants to arrange Lance ahead somehow. Or Max takes the first championship, and the next one is going to be all in with Lance or nothing. We have to remember that Lance has bought himself into F1 so he can buy the championship too.

Matt2725
Matt2725
9
Joined: 02 Mar 2023, 13:12

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 13:23
Rikhart wrote:
Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 09:16
Next year might be too soon. Alonso is still there with a contract until the end of 2026. And I'm not sure what Verstappen thinks of Lance being on the team. Will Lawrence let Max drive for the championship?
Let? Do you really think Stroll would be anywhere near Verstappen? Maybe if they added 50 kgs of ballast that could happen!
Of course, Lance wouldn't keep up with Max's pace, but if the car is dominant, anything is possible. For now, sabotaging Alonso won't benefit the team because they aren't fighting for wins, but when it comes down to a championship fight, I can imagine that Lawrence wants to arrange Lance ahead somehow. Or Max takes the first championship, and the next one is going to be all in with Lance or nothing. We have to remember that Lance has bought himself into F1 so he can buy the championship too.
Can only buy it if you're miles ahead of the competition. Lance in the best car would still be beatable by better drivers in slower machinery.

Dunlay
Dunlay
1
Joined: 10 Mar 2024, 15:23

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

AeroDynamic wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 12:27
organic wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 22:42
AeroDynamic wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 22:09
How long can Horner remain? Several high profile red bull people have chose to leave the team within a span of a few months, while they were just beginning to enjoy a dominance cycle. Jos predicted this.
He has the backing of the Thai ownership. If they removed him now they'd be admitting defeat against the Austrian side of rb. Wheatley, who was the most obvious replacement, has already left so perhaps that ship has sailed
The Thai ‘leadership’ lack credibility to understand the business. Horner staying has clearly unsettled and disrupted a great team of people. He was more replaceable than those that left.

Horner, if he puts the team first, doesn’t need the Thai ownership to give him consent to stand down. I’m sure he understands the only benefit in him keeping the position, is to serve himself. It is not serving the team’s best interest. When Wheatley was there, it was obvious to anyone from the outside what strength and depth the team has to take over his responsibilities but he’s chosen himself over the team.
All this, IF F1 domination or championships is "ALL" that Red Bull corporation wants. I am willing to say, that's what average joe wants, not the billionaire business bosses. It's already reported that Yuvidhya has bigger plans for Red Bull GmbH and short term lack of success in F1, isn't probably a bummer for the bigger plans. Undesirable yes, but that won't mean sky is falling for them. They have gone without success for 7 years, but stuck around and eventually the success returned. Who is to say that won't happen again? Yes, Newey isn't there, it's a another big test.

KimiRai
KimiRai
250
Joined: 10 Aug 2022, 20:08

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 09:16
Next year might be too soon. Alonso is still there with a contract until the end of 2026. And I'm not sure what Verstappen thinks of Lance being on the team. Will Lawrence let Max drive for the championship?
Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 13:23
Of course, Lance wouldn't keep up with Max's pace, but if the car is dominant, anything is possible. For now, sabotaging Alonso won't benefit the team because they aren't fighting for wins, but when it comes down to a championship fight, I can imagine that Lawrence wants to arrange Lance ahead somehow.
At the start of 2023 when they knew they had a competitive machine they treated both drivers fairly. Alonso fought for a win in Canada and Monaco and they didn't tell him to slow down so Lance could catch them. There is some nepotism going on with the driver arrangement sure, but it's not to *that* amount. :lol:

I also see Max to AM as likely but it depends on many things at the moment. How RBPT performs, how Honda performs, how much Alonso wants to keep going... Imagine if Stroll sells it to the Saudis and they kick Lance to form a superteam with Max & Alonso.
Last edited by KimiRai on 26 Sep 2024, 16:05, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Jurgen von Diaz
0
Joined: 11 Feb 2024, 18:38

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

KimiRai wrote:
Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 09:16
Next year might be too soon. Alonso is still there with a contract until the end of 2026. And I'm not sure what Verstappen thinks of Lance being on the team. Will Lawrence let Max drive for the championship?
Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 13:23
Of course, Lance wouldn't keep up with Max's pace, but if the car is dominant, anything is possible. For now, sabotaging Alonso won't benefit the team because they aren't fighting for wins, but when it comes down to a championship fight, I can imagine that Lawrence wants to arrange Lance ahead somehow.
At the start of 2023 when they knew they had a competitive machine they treated both drivers fairly. Alonso fought for a win in Canada and Monaco and they didn't tell him to slow down so Lance could catch them. There is some nepotism going on with the driver arrangement sure, but it's not to *that* amount.

I also see Max to AM as likely but it depends on many things at the moment. How RBPT performs, how AM performs, how much Alonso wants to keep going... Imagine if Stroll sells it to the Saudis and they kick Lance to form a superteam with Max & Alonso. Many things could happen still.
I mean a dominant car, like Red Bull when Pérez followed Verstappen to the finish line. If that were the case, I'm afraid there could be a temptation to arrange their positions the other way somehow if Lance would be regulary P2...

User avatar
bananapeel23
9
Joined: 14 Feb 2023, 22:43

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:30
KimiRai wrote:
Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 09:16
Next year might be too soon. Alonso is still there with a contract until the end of 2026. And I'm not sure what Verstappen thinks of Lance being on the team. Will Lawrence let Max drive for the championship?
Jurgen von Diaz wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 13:23
Of course, Lance wouldn't keep up with Max's pace, but if the car is dominant, anything is possible. For now, sabotaging Alonso won't benefit the team because they aren't fighting for wins, but when it comes down to a championship fight, I can imagine that Lawrence wants to arrange Lance ahead somehow.
At the start of 2023 when they knew they had a competitive machine they treated both drivers fairly. Alonso fought for a win in Canada and Monaco and they didn't tell him to slow down so Lance could catch them. There is some nepotism going on with the driver arrangement sure, but it's not to *that* amount.

I also see Max to AM as likely but it depends on many things at the moment. How RBPT performs, how AM performs, how much Alonso wants to keep going... Imagine if Stroll sells it to the Saudis and they kick Lance to form a superteam with Max & Alonso. Many things could happen still.
I mean a dominant car, like Red Bull when Pérez followed Verstappen to the finish line. If that were the case, I'm afraid there could be a temptation to arrange their positions the other way somehow if Lance would be regulary P2...
The only way Lance gets a WDC in a dominant car is if they have a dominant car for several seasons in a row, refuse to renew the better drivers contract and then put someone like Latifi or Sargeant in the other car.

User avatar
AeroDynamic
349
Joined: 28 Sep 2021, 12:25
Location: La règle du jeu

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Dunlay wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:08
AeroDynamic wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 12:27
organic wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 22:42


He has the backing of the Thai ownership. If they removed him now they'd be admitting defeat against the Austrian side of rb. Wheatley, who was the most obvious replacement, has already left so perhaps that ship has sailed
The Thai ‘leadership’ lack credibility to understand the business. Horner staying has clearly unsettled and disrupted a great team of people. He was more replaceable than those that left.

Horner, if he puts the team first, doesn’t need the Thai ownership to give him consent to stand down. I’m sure he understands the only benefit in him keeping the position, is to serve himself. It is not serving the team’s best interest. When Wheatley was there, it was obvious to anyone from the outside what strength and depth the team has to take over his responsibilities but he’s chosen himself over the team.
All this, IF F1 domination or championships is "ALL" that Red Bull corporation wants. I am willing to say, that's what average joe wants, not the billionaire business bosses. It's already reported that Yuvidhya has bigger plans for Red Bull GmbH and short term lack of success in F1, isn't probably a bummer for the bigger plans. Undesirable yes, but that won't mean sky is falling for them. They have gone without success for 7 years, but stuck around and eventually the success returned. Who is to say that won't happen again? Yes, Newey isn't there, it's a another big test.
That's probably why key people have left - like Newey - and why Red Bull were a force under DM. In F1, giving everything to win and become champion is the whole point. I don't think this belongs to the average Joe at all unless you think DM, Newey, Horner, and everyone in F1 that make their teams become successful, is the average Joe.

If the Thai ownership posses such a loser mentality as you speculate they do, they shouldn't be in F1.

Dunlay
Dunlay
1
Joined: 10 Mar 2024, 15:23

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

AeroDynamic wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:46
Dunlay wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:08
AeroDynamic wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 12:27


The Thai ‘leadership’ lack credibility to understand the business. Horner staying has clearly unsettled and disrupted a great team of people. He was more replaceable than those that left.

Horner, if he puts the team first, doesn’t need the Thai ownership to give him consent to stand down. I’m sure he understands the only benefit in him keeping the position, is to serve himself. It is not serving the team’s best interest. When Wheatley was there, it was obvious to anyone from the outside what strength and depth the team has to take over his responsibilities but he’s chosen himself over the team.
All this, IF F1 domination or championships is "ALL" that Red Bull corporation wants. I am willing to say, that's what average joe wants, not the billionaire business bosses. It's already reported that Yuvidhya has bigger plans for Red Bull GmbH and short term lack of success in F1, isn't probably a bummer for the bigger plans. Undesirable yes, but that won't mean sky is falling for them. They have gone without success for 7 years, but stuck around and eventually the success returned. Who is to say that won't happen again? Yes, Newey isn't there, it's a another big test.
That's probably why key people have left - like Newey - and why Red Bull were a force under DM. In F1, giving everything to win and become champion is the whole point. I don't think this belongs to the average Joe at all unless you think DM, Newey, Horner, and everyone in F1 that make their teams become successful, is the average Joe.

If the Thai ownership posses such a loser mentality as you speculate they do, they shouldn't be in F1.
Every practical team owner knows, you can't keep winning, once you reached the summit, you can't be there forever. Success goes in circles and that's exactly what FIA wants and why they keep changing regulations. Even if the objective for every team is to win every year, but that's never happened in the history of F1. An average Joe wants to see Ferrari winning every year or Lewis winning every race or Max winning every race. That's where the pragmatism of doing business and continuing in the sport comes in, where bigger picture becomes more important than the short term loss of success. Team personnel have been changing since F1 has existed. If any team owner things these shouldn't happen or that they keep winning every race, then that's delusional. So I think they know it's the end of the world when team personnel leave or success eludes for a phase. I am sure if DM was alive, nobody would have orchesterated this whole scandal saga. But would Red Bull have continued winning every race? I bet not. Wouldn't the team personnel leave? I bet they would have. Newey himself in the past considered leaving Red Bull for an offer with other teams. Just that it didn't materialize. What would have people blamed if Newey had left when DM was alive and Red Bull wasn't having success? That's why, team owners are far more rationale to these periodic waves of changes, than an average Joe is.

User avatar
AeroDynamic
349
Joined: 28 Sep 2021, 12:25
Location: La règle du jeu

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Dunlay wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:58
AeroDynamic wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:46
Dunlay wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:08
All this, IF F1 domination or championships is "ALL" that Red Bull corporation wants. I am willing to say, that's what average joe wants, not the billionaire business bosses. It's already reported that Yuvidhya has bigger plans for Red Bull GmbH and short term lack of success in F1, isn't probably a bummer for the bigger plans. Undesirable yes, but that won't mean sky is falling for them. They have gone without success for 7 years, but stuck around and eventually the success returned. Who is to say that won't happen again? Yes, Newey isn't there, it's a another big test.
That's probably why key people have left - like Newey - and why Red Bull were a force under DM. In F1, giving everything to win and become champion is the whole point. I don't think this belongs to the average Joe at all unless you think DM, Newey, Horner, and everyone in F1 that make their teams become successful, is the average Joe.

If the Thai ownership posses such a loser mentality as you speculate they do, they shouldn't be in F1.
Every practical team owner knows, you can't keep winning, once you reached the summit, you can't be there forever. Success goes in circles and that's exactly what FIA wants and why they keep changing regulations. Even if the objective for every team is to win every year, but that's never happened in the history of F1. An average Joe wants to see Ferrari winning every year or Lewis winning every race or Max winning every race. That's where the pragmatism of doing business and continuing in the sport comes in, where bigger picture becomes more important than the short term loss of success. Team personnel have been changing since F1 has existed. If any team owner things these shouldn't happen or that they keep winning every race, then that's delusional. So I think they know it's the end of the world when team personnel leave or success eludes for a phase. I am sure if DM was alive, nobody would have orchesterated this whole scandal saga. But would Red Bull have continued winning every race? I bet not. Wouldn't the team personnel leave? I bet they would have. Newey himself in the past considered leaving Red Bull for an offer with other teams. Just that it didn't materialized. What would have people blamed if Newey had left when DM was alive and Red Bull wasn't having success? That's why, team owners are far more rationale to these periodic waves of changes, than an average Joe is.
Its not realistic to keep winning. Its very difficult to get there. Thats why when you get there, you have to make the most of it while you can. Keeping Horner is clearly doing the opposite, and fast.

losing the top designer, top sporting director, and other key people in strategy, technical, and mechanic level - in the space of a few months - while also potentially losing your top driver - is no way to make the most of your time at the top after just 2 years.

I'm willing to speculate that if Horner stepped down right away, the team would be in better shape right now and potentially remain dominant at least into 26.

Dunlay
Dunlay
1
Joined: 10 Mar 2024, 15:23

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

AeroDynamic wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 16:02
Dunlay wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:58
AeroDynamic wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 15:46


That's probably why key people have left - like Newey - and why Red Bull were a force under DM. In F1, giving everything to win and become champion is the whole point. I don't think this belongs to the average Joe at all unless you think DM, Newey, Horner, and everyone in F1 that make their teams become successful, is the average Joe.

If the Thai ownership posses such a loser mentality as you speculate they do, they shouldn't be in F1.
Every practical team owner knows, you can't keep winning, once you reached the summit, you can't be there forever. Success goes in circles and that's exactly what FIA wants and why they keep changing regulations. Even if the objective for every team is to win every year, but that's never happened in the history of F1. An average Joe wants to see Ferrari winning every year or Lewis winning every race or Max winning every race. That's where the pragmatism of doing business and continuing in the sport comes in, where bigger picture becomes more important than the short term loss of success. Team personnel have been changing since F1 has existed. If any team owner things these shouldn't happen or that they keep winning every race, then that's delusional. So I think they know it's the end of the world when team personnel leave or success eludes for a phase. I am sure if DM was alive, nobody would have orchesterated this whole scandal saga. But would Red Bull have continued winning every race? I bet not. Wouldn't the team personnel leave? I bet they would have. Newey himself in the past considered leaving Red Bull for an offer with other teams. Just that it didn't materialized. What would have people blamed if Newey had left when DM was alive and Red Bull wasn't having success? That's why, team owners are far more rationale to these periodic waves of changes, than an average Joe is.
Its not realistic to keep winning. Its very difficult to get there. Thats why when you get there, you have to make the most of it while you can. Keeping Horner is clearly doing the opposite, and fast.

losing the top designer, top sporting director, and other key people in strategy, technical, and mechanic level - in the space of a few months - while also potentially losing your top driver - is no way to make the most of your time at the top after just 2 years.

I'm willing to speculate that if Horner stepped down right away, the team would be in better shape right now and potentially remain dominant at least into 26.
Ferrari has chopped top bosses so many times, did that yield anything? It was Horner that has seen 2 successful phases for the team. Replacing him isn't going to bring success that has started eluding them. If they have depth in their ranks, they will rise again. Else, they would require a few years to rebuild the team. Whether it's Horner or anyone else, that process isn't going to change.

Waz
Waz
1
Joined: 03 Mar 2024, 09:29

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Horner isn't the problem, unless you drank some of the Jos Verstappen Kool Aid

User avatar
Sieper
73
Joined: 14 Mar 2017, 15:19

Re: 2024 Oracle Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

AeroDynamic wrote:
26 Sep 2024, 12:27
organic wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 22:42
AeroDynamic wrote:
25 Sep 2024, 22:09
How long can Horner remain? Several high profile red bull people have chose to leave the team within a span of a few months, while they were just beginning to enjoy a dominance cycle. Jos predicted this.
He has the backing of the Thai ownership. If they removed him now they'd be admitting defeat against the Austrian side of rb. Wheatley, who was the most obvious replacement, has already left so perhaps that ship has sailed
The Thai ‘leadership’ lack credibility to understand the business. Horner staying has clearly unsettled and disrupted a great team of people. He was more replaceable than those that left.

Horner, if he puts the team first, doesn’t need the Thai ownership to give him consent to stand down. I’m sure he understands the only benefit in him keeping the position, is to serve himself. It is not serving the team’s best interest. When Wheatley was there, it was obvious to anyone from the outside what strength and depth the team has to take over his responsibilities but he’s chosen himself over the team.
Couldn’t have said it better =D>