Sevach wrote:Blown wheel nut at the rear? curious.stefan_ wrote:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/u ... tail-2.jpg
No. Light, shadow, and camera angle.

Sevach wrote:Blown wheel nut at the rear? curious.stefan_ wrote:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/u ... tail-2.jpg
http://formula1.com/wi/enlarge/sutton/2 ... 4oc308.jpg <- Image posted by CrucialX in the STR 9 threadCBeck113 wrote:I just saw this on the diffusor edges:
http://i.imgur.com/02cwNUd.jpg
That I don't remember seeing on other cars - the edge of the diffusor has been straight over the entire width on all ohter cars...hmmm...
Wrong quote man.Pilatus wrote:Sevach wrote:Blown wheel nut at the rear? curious.stefan_ wrote:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/u ... tail-2.jpg
No. Light, shadow, and camera angle.
http://s27.postimg.org/rkyq4e45v/3_4_RETRO_2015_OK.jpg
Tell that to Kimi fans.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:For all of those people who continue to criticize the team for and swear the pull rod front suspension is a problem, here's James Allison confirming the pull rod front suspension has NOT been a problem and was NOT a problem on the F14T...
Quite a special spoke design front and rear
I was only against same exact configuration as features previous year. Seeing they changed that, I'm quite pleased.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:For all of those people who continue to criticize the team for and swear the pull rod front suspension is a problem, here's James Allison confirming the pull rod front suspension has NOT been a problem and was NOT a problem on the F14T...
“So when you decide what to work on you have to pick quite carefully the things that you think are going to bring the maximum amount of return for your effort. And push-rod, poll-rod on the front, it has pros and cons either side.
“Pull-rod is probably harder to get light and stiff but it’s probably a bit easier to get an aerodynamic performance from it. So it’s swings and roundabouts. It was an area of the car that was something that wasn’t felt to be a problem on last year’s car and therefore not an area that really merited investment of effort in this time around on the SF-15T.”
My point exactly, and doesn't look like camera angle/light :theblackangus wrote:Almost looks like the vertical fins are covered on the outside and direct air inside the rear wing only.
These are studio photos. it looks to me they could have intentionally smugged that area in photo shop not to give away the real shape.outsid3r wrote:My point exactly, and doesn't look like camera angle/light :theblackangus wrote:Almost looks like the vertical fins are covered on the outside and direct air inside the rear wing only.
http://s27.postimg.org/3uqi0w7tf/ferrar ... tail_2.jpg
Whar are they up to? :S
I like your "Train of Thought". Someone should "Take the Time" to move these "Images and Words".Dream Theater wrote:Isn't time to open the SF15-T thread?