I think that part of the problem is that no one is 100% sure of what is happening. There were reports last night of the ash cloud subsiding and flights starting over the next few days. On other channels at the same time the reports were saying that there was away to be a second larger cloud from the same volcano and this morning there was word of a second volcano nearby possibly erupting!WhiteBlue wrote:I'm convinced that 90% of the German, French, Italian and Spanish flights could have been executed if a better prediction of the ash levels and proper procedures had been developed for the scenario. I'm not saying the governments did something wrong. But if this thing happens again and all parties are 100% prepared very few flights outside the UK and Scandinavia would be called off. Air traffic to Germany is almost back to normal now. It turns out that airlines can manage with radar guided VFR in most cases and that the turbine damage from very low ash intake can be deal with by increased boroscopic inspection schedules.
The problem with a computer simulation is that it is only as good as the programmer and the available data.autogyro wrote:The trouble is, predictions on the density and danger posed by the ash cloud has been done using computer simulation and not reality.
The British Labour government had no choice, because last Month it had taken out of service the only aircraft with a radar capable of giving acurate 'real' data, the MK3 Nimrod.
So as usual everything is being done using guess work and the results have taken humanity a little further away from reality.
The ash cloud is pretty much dispersed now so flights are resuming, the only problem is another ash cloud is on its way and there is the possibility of a much bigger eruption.
The German goverment has started to scan the skies with a specially laser equipped Falcon 20E jet aircraft operated by DLR.autogyro wrote:The trouble is, predictions on the density and danger posed by the ash cloud has been done using computer simulation and not reality.
The British Labour government had no choice, because last Month it had taken out of service the only aircraft with a radar capable of giving acurate 'real' data, the MK3 Nimrod.
So as usual everything is being done using guess work and the results have taken humanity a little further away from reality.
The ash cloud is pretty much dispersed now so flights are resuming, the only problem is another ash cloud is on its way and there is the possibility of a much bigger eruption.
Very good point about the Nimrod, but in a area of our modren lifes, air travel and air security, the bottom line is saftey, and thats why the Nimrod was taken out of service by the Armed Forces. The thing is that we are 13 years away from developing a new one, and arround 2-3 years away from being able to equip and modify a suitable intrim replacement for the Nimrod.autogyro wrote:The trouble is, predictions on the density and danger posed by the ash cloud has been done using computer simulation and not reality.
The British Labour government had no choice, because last Month it had taken out of service the only aircraft with a radar capable of giving acurate 'real' data, the MK3 Nimrod.
So as usual everything is being done using guess work and the results have taken humanity a little further away from reality.
The ash cloud is pretty much dispersed now so flights are resuming, the only problem is another ash cloud is on its way and there is the possibility of a much bigger eruption.
Aircraft engine manufacturer doesn't allow any ash in the air for flight. So any ash is too much.WhiteBlue wrote:I'm convinced that 90% of the German, French, Italian and Spanish flights could have been executed if a better prediction of the ash levels and proper procedures had been developed for the scenario. I'm not saying the governments did something wrong. But if this thing happens again and all parties are 100% prepared very few flights outside the UK and Scandinavia would be called off. Air traffic to Germany is almost back to normal now. It turns out that airlines can manage with radar guided VFR in most cases and that the turbine damage from very low ash intake can be deal with by increased boroscopic inspection schedules.
Such a pity the old piston engined airliners are not available. Just fit desert sand filters on the intakes and fly.Edis wrote:Aircraft engine manufacturer doesn't allow any ash in the air for flight. So any ash is too much.WhiteBlue wrote:I'm convinced that 90% of the German, French, Italian and Spanish flights could have been executed if a better prediction of the ash levels and proper procedures had been developed for the scenario. I'm not saying the governments did something wrong. But if this thing happens again and all parties are 100% prepared very few flights outside the UK and Scandinavia would be called off. Air traffic to Germany is almost back to normal now. It turns out that airlines can manage with radar guided VFR in most cases and that the turbine damage from very low ash intake can be deal with by increased boroscopic inspection schedules.
Ash is highly abrasive and contrain very small particles. They will damage fans and compressors by erosion, they will end up in the engine oil. They will melt in the combustion chamber where their high sulphur levels will cause corrision in a rapid rate, and they can cause a flame out. They will solidify on the turbines where they will damage their heat insulating surface and they can also clog the small cooling air channels that are used to cool the hot parts in the engine causing the engine to overheat.
There are obviously sensible people holding different opinions or we would not have had a bunch of successful flights. There must be levels that are tolerable.Edis wrote:Aircraft engine manufacturer doesn't allow any ash in the air for flight. So any ash is too much.
Could we keep to the technical aspect such as "The old Nimrod could have done this because it had the right equipment" and leave out the politics please?autogyro wrote:The reason why....
ESPImperium wrote:.....Eyjafjallajokul