It directs air under the wing, speeding it up and creating a low pressure area. For more information, type 'ground effect' on google.Henning wrote:It looks like the front, lowermost, element of the wing is angled so the trailing edge is lower than the front edge. From my simple aerodynamics understanding, that would seem to me to produce lift and not downforce.Thunders wrote:http://images.adrivo.com/images/950/q_8 ... 737310.jpg
Can someone with more understanding explain this please.
"McLaren debuts in Melbourne a new floor and new front brake ducts. A new front wing is expected at Bahrain."GoranF1 wrote:https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 4480861185
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Corrected that for youDiogoBrand wrote:"McLaren debuts in Melbourne a new floor and new rear brake ducts. A new front wing is expected at Bahrain."GoranF1 wrote:https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 4480861185
Thanks DiogoBrand. It was the way I was looking at the picture it just looked like a downward slope, not a curve.DiogoBrand wrote:It directs air under the wing, speeding it up and creating a low pressure area. For more information, type 'ground effect' on google.Henning wrote:It looks like the front, lowermost, element of the wing is angled so the trailing edge is lower than the front edge. From my simple aerodynamics understanding, that would seem to me to produce lift and not downforce.Thunders wrote:http://images.adrivo.com/images/950/q_8 ... 737310.jpg
Can someone with more understanding explain this please.
Just sky f1 morons. Ignore them. I lost count today alone how many time kravitz was spewing complete bullshit.GoranF1 wrote:Looking at today's practice sessions i am not sure why TedKravitz and company,kept saying chassis is worse tan last year....car looked really good today in the wet.