
Via AutoSport
Not sure whether it is new. I can't really tell. It might the distortion of the camera lens, but it seems like the flaps of the top FW are longer and flatter.remix wrote:isnt this a new FR? the first one
I think Gary Anderson needs to look at the Red Bull (currently the fastest car) front wing endplate because it only has one small duct.jonaliew wrote:Thanks for sharing Crucial. Anyone in agreement of GA analysis (from an engineering standpoint)? He seems pretty -ve about it.
I also thought the cascades had changed but then I realised that it is a matter of perspective. The cascade on the lower wing looks shorter because it is deeper in the picture.jonaliew wrote:Not sure whether it is new. I can't really tell. It might the distortion of the camera lens, but it seems like the flaps of the top FW are longer and flatter.remix wrote:isnt this a new FR? the first one
Reading Mr. Andersons comments on the F2012 one would think he was describing an HRT, not the car that is clearly the second best on the grid at the moment. He has harped on the Ferrari front wing endplates as being to simplistic all season, while the current Red Bull design appears far more basic than the current Ferrari approach. I also believe if he was as good at F1 aero as he thinks he is, he would currently be employed as a designer, not a commentator for the BBC.f1316 wrote:Whenever I read or hear Gary Anderson's comments on the F2012, he seems to think they're not doing enough in whichever area he's talking about. I wonder whether:
a) the current car, supposedly aggressive, is still too conservative in many areas
or
b) he simply doesn't understand the aero philosophy Ferrari have taken and so none of the individual areas, which may work very well together, make any sense to him.
It's always surprising to hear him talk so negatively about each area of a car that is now pretty competitive. I'm sure he knows his stuff, but I'm surprised that the coke bottle, front wing and diffuser of a front-running car could be as basic as he seems to suggest.
Magny Cours does indeed seem to have been a waste in terms of development of the F2012. The few 'new' parts they did manage to test have not been used in a race. And on top of that, parts they did try at the races just after the Magny Cours test didn't work. Given the wind tunnel correlation issues Ferrari have had, I would have thought they would have wanted to track test as many new concepts as possible.f1316 wrote:The changes to the front wing pillars seem to be a thin of the past, don't they?
Seems like that Magny Cours test was a bit of a wasted opportunity, with their rivals having a chance to test after this next race.