Which ones are you interested in?xpensive wrote:Most interesting, some diagrams you can share with us?
Much the same thing can be said about Byrne if you like. Just one step closer.xpensive wrote:Ross Brawn was never directly involved in chassis design during the golden years with Ferrari
The same can be said for Adrian Newey that it was Prodomou that did the real work. The point is that when a TD is successful there is always a capable group working with him. Newey did not achieve a lot of success during the Ferrari domination days and Mclaren first won a championship in years after he left. So does that mean he is a bad TD?! The point is that its a team effort. So to not give Bell any credit is just wrong.munudeges wrote:I think that's why Adrian Newey described that set up when he asked who was Technical Director as 'strange', and no, it isn't the same structure they had under Jean Todt. What they had was a Technical Director in all but name in Rory Byrne and a track operations head in Ross Brawn who was called a Technical Director, hence the confusion as to who really did what. This is a bit of a mess that I can't see producing a car with any coherent thinking behind it.xpensive wrote:Perhaps OT, but when discussing strange organizations, this is how Wiki describes Ferrari post-Aldo Costa;
"Chassis director" (Pat Fry) is one of 3 positions (the other two being: "production director" - currently filled by Corrado Lanzone; and "electronics director" - currently filled by Luca Marmorini). All 3 engineering positions operate on an equal footing within the team and all report directly to team boss Domenicali who has now taken over responsibility regarding on circuit strategy and other functions previously assigned to "technical director".
How a business administrator like Domenicali could possibly act decisively over those guys is beyond me?
Point is, I think Newey believes that you need a dyed-in-the-wool technical person who is going to have a clear idea of what form the car will ultimately take, and in the case of Ferrari I believe that person should have been Tombazis. Even having a Technical Director isn't enough. Bob Bell has a lot of experience but I just don't think he is that person. When he was at Renault it was Mike Gascoyne that kicked off the type of car they ultimately had for four seasons and had probably the best mechanical people around like Rob Marshall. When Bell was at McLaren people like Gordon Murray did the real thinking.
Prodomou has a major role in designing the car which is why apparently Ferrari were trying to hire him after they failed to impose themselves on the championship yet again this year.raymondu999 wrote:Does Prodromou do the real work? Really? I get the impression he's still got a big hand in car designs, design concepts, etc
No. Newey has a track-record of being hands-on with the car where Bell doesn't. The real ideas have always come from other people where that just isn't the case with Newey. Cars developed under him have always had pretty clear philosophies.Hemsy wrote:The same can be said for Adrian Newey that it was Prodomou that did the real work.