We effectively have a 2 week gap actually, but you're right, people will turn up with new bits, and there's certainly more thinking time.wesley123 wrote:It is too soon to say. We have a 4week gap and everyone is coming with new parts
I'm very much not convinced by that - even if things stay exactly as they are, or if McLaren became even stronger, I would expect Vettel to still have a 50pt lead at the end of the season.wesley123 wrote:including Red Bull, they pretty much have to, because currently it looks like it that Vettels points advantage will disappear into nothing
I'd personally bet that McLaren will continue to out-do RBR on development pace, simply because they have the least understood car on the grid.On the other hand, McLaren will do the same and will probably run the new short chord wing.
It's difficult to change a tub mid-season without testswesley123 wrote: as I read Tubs arent homologated anymore, can we expect teams to see cars with changed tubs?
I was wondering the same... does it mean that when they finally understand it, it will turn out they can't do anything more with the design or that they have a lot of peformance left in the design? LRGP e.g. seems to understand that they can't extract anything more from their FEE design. Dead end. Who knows if they same fate awaits McLaren.raymondu999 wrote:That's curious. Wouldn't a car that's not understood be difficult to develop? Or do you mean least understood in terms of it's a new "alien" design with unique side pods that has a lot of potential still needing to be unlocked?
No, it means that as they understand it more they'll understand what it does well and what it does badly, and be able to tweak it to change the things it does badly into things it does well. It's obvious that they can do more with the design, because there are faster cars out there in the right circumstances – the question becomes "how do you modify this design to catch and/or beat that design is the question", and it can only be answered when they know why their current version doesn't beat that other design.Donuts wrote:I was wondering the same... does it mean that when they finally understand it, it will turn out they can't do anything more with the design or that they have a lot of peformance left in the design? LRGP e.g. seems to understand that they can't extract anything more from their FEE design. Dead end. Who knows if they same fate awaits McLaren.raymondu999 wrote:That's curious. Wouldn't a car that's not understood be difficult to develop? Or do you mean least understood in terms of it's a new "alien" design with unique side pods that has a lot of potential still needing to be unlocked?
Clearly a falsehood. Yes, some upgrades will end up being big ones... But... Clearly there is a better design out there, the RBR is lapping faster than you. Maybe you need to get your design out of a local minima... but it absolutely 100% *is* possible to get better performance out of changing your design.raymondu999 wrote:At the risk of feeding further off-topic banter, I think it needs to be noted that not all cars are born equal, and there is a limit to how much pace can be unlocked from a car through upgrades. I'm not saying the McLaren is one of those. But that was almost certainly the case with the -25 last year, just as soon as it hit its sweet spot the development sort of just stopped dead-on save for a few good upgrades. But for example I doubt the HRT, given even, say.. 25 years of upgrading with upgrades/updates to the wings/diffusers/whatnot, could compete with the -26 or the RB7