Iv heard so many people say this, its completley incorrect.wesley123 wrote:Wet definately not, then you can scrape all known things, then it is just who can drive the best in the rain, then the brawn will win as it simly seems to have great traction out of slow corners, monaco have proven it and also on bahrain it was proven.WhiteBlue wrote:If the wet and relatively cold weather continues it will favour Red Bull.
Iv heard so many people say this, its completley incorrect.wesley123 wrote:Wet definately not, then you can scrape all known things, then it is just who can drive the best in the rain, then the brawn will win as it simly seems to have great traction out of slow corners, monaco have proven it and also on bahrain it was proven.WhiteBlue wrote:If the wet and relatively cold weather continues it will favour Red Bull.
Good article mate, and a very good point re tyre use and heat.WhiteBlue wrote:A pretty good explanation. So we can expect RBR to be strong and there might be a surprise as well when Brawn get to test their new components.
I thought that tyre heat generation was one of the more important aspects as well. The following link gives a bit of an insight and explains why the new RBR has a longer wheel base.
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/08072009/ ... anced.html
BMW will also have a big aero upgrade package to test. I hope they can make some progress.
That is plain bullshit, why they run springs then? because it helps better traction in the wet, the suspension plays a bigger role then the earodynamics.SoliRossi wrote:Iv heard so many people say this, its completley incorrect.wesley123 wrote:Wet definately not, then you can scrape all known things, then it is just who can drive the best in the rain, then the brawn will win as it simly seems to have great traction out of slow corners, monaco have proven it and also on bahrain it was proven.WhiteBlue wrote:If the wet and relatively cold weather continues it will favour Red Bull.
RBR has wet weather pace over brawn due to aero. The profile of the wet tyre 'clicks' with the RB5 aero (davidson discussed this on BBC). WHen it is wet your mechanical traction is pointless, the road surface is going to let go at the same level for all cars, and all cars traction will far exceed what the wet surface will allow.
However your aero efficiency is still as effective as when its dry. Sure you are not going as quick (so less downforce) but the air still hits the wings in the same fashion, and in turn pushes your tyres onto the road.
So when its wet if you avhe good aero you can generate more pressure on your tyre/road (downforce) and then you grip/speed will be greater.
And the only reason why Button won in Malaysia was because he was miles in front before it rained, Webber was hauling him in and would have cleared him if the race went the distance (and remaind wet). Button also commented after china that the RBR is untouchable i the wet, he said every corner he was behind Mark he could not even hold the same line.
2006 was Hockenheim.WhiteBlue wrote:I also checked a qualifying lap of 2006 and they are taking the softer kink now. So that is the current lay out as indicated by the map on page 1 of the thread.
You can rely on me to know Hockenheim from Nürburgring. Didn't they do both Rings back in 2006?tk421 wrote:2006 was Hockenheim.WhiteBlue wrote:I also checked a qualifying lap of 2006 and they are taking the softer kink now. So that is the current lay out as indicated by the map on page 1 of the thread.
In 2007, our last race here, they were using the sharper of the two left-rights...