Its only puppy yapping.richard_leeds wrote:Anyway, back to the topic ...
The Autsin folk were being silly billies. Any attempt to renegotiate with Bernie only leads one way. That's because Bernie is happy to tear up a void contract and walk away leaving the promoters with the huge sunk costs of a partially developed track.
So I agree with WB that the new contract needlessly costs more money than the original because the Austin folk started bickering while Bernie rubbed his hands with glee.
Actually, we don't know anything about the new contract, other than the fact that it's with COTA rather than Tavo. It could be a ten year deal for $1 a race, or a one year deal for $100m with a clause that Red McCombs has to wave the checkered flag wearing a pink tutu.richard_leeds wrote:So I agree with WB that the new contract needlessly costs more money than the original because...
Hairy Hairy Hairy...I know Texas...I've lived there...It ain't gonna be that green.Just found this new rFactor video of CoTA posted yesterday on youtube.
The only known difference, as far as I can tell at this point, is there is one profiteer less to share the spoils?Pup wrote:Actually, we don't know anything about the new contract, other than the fact that it's with COTA rather than Tavo. It could be a ten year deal for $1 a race, or a one year deal for $100m with a clause that Red McCombs has to wave the checkered flag wearing a pink tutu.richard_leeds wrote:So I agree with WB that the new contract needlessly costs more money than the original because...
Texas has hills?hairy_scotsman wrote:The elevation changes are actually much more dramatic than they appear here, but this looks like a fairly good estimation of the circuit.
Yes, Texas has hills, and plenty of them. While the track lies on the east, flatter side of town, there is still 133 feet of elevation change. Except for the esses, you're either going to be climbing or descending pretty much the whole way around.bhallg2k wrote:Texas has hills?hairy_scotsman wrote:The elevation changes are actually much more dramatic than they appear here, but this looks like a fairly good estimation of the circuit.
Texas is very big. Where did you live? Austin sits pretty much right on a dividing line. Dry & hilly on the west. Flat farmland to the north. Flat and VERY green farmland to the east. East Texas is as green as Scotland and is very wet.Hairy Hairy Hairy...I know Texas...I've lived there...It ain't gonna be that green.
Give the guys a break. They haven't even been out there yet. When you consider that, it's pretty good, imho. You should have seen the first one.There's also going to be a bit of camber on the road.
You mean they're less the guy who built the whole deal? Actually, despite the removal of his picture from the COTA website, everything I'm hearing indicates Hellmund still has not been bought out, although CoTA investors might like to encourage that appearance. The website shows only photos of "staff" now. It's kinda funny, 'cause they only show the President, VP, CFO, & CMO, but there's room on the page for everyone else in the office.xpensive wrote:The only known difference, as far as I can tell at this point, is there is one profiteer less to share the spoils?Pup wrote:Actually, we don't know anything about the new contract, other than the fact that it's with COTA rather than Tavo. It could be a ten year deal for $1 a race, or a one year deal for $100m with a clause that Red McCombs has to wave the checkered flag wearing a pink tutu.richard_leeds wrote:So I agree with WB that the new contract needlessly costs more money than the original because...
Hellmund brought a $25M/year asset...the METF funding. You're ignoring the several years of work Hellmund actually did and the relationships he has that made this deal a reality and attempting to spin it as if it all just fell into his lap. It didn't, and without Hellmund, there would be no CoTA.xpensive wrote:No actually, I mean they're less an x-formula 2 driver who thought that just because of his dad's alleged friendhip with MrE, he was somehow entitled to a windfall of greenbacks without any input from himself whatsoever.