They've been testing discs with different cooling holes. Split/double and plain rectangular/single.
Let's have a fightTim.Wright wrote:No they are the torsion bars.furnik28 wrote:there is the same on the other side of it it could be for kers. "NOT A ROLL BAR" as they r those things top corners of the chassis
Tim
sorry how long have u been in f1 or do you play ps2 gamesTim.Wright wrote:No they are the torsion bars.furnik28 wrote:there is the same on the other side of it it could be for kers. "NOT A ROLL BAR" as they r those things top corners of the chassis
Tim
I do not deny this.My pointis .will the heating be able to recover the speed lost in the radiator core?marekk wrote:Marcus,marcush. wrote:forget this ramming thing.You got a significant pressure drop through this duct even without a radiator.And the pressure drop will not go away by making the inlet bigger.
At a certain point of necking down the pressure drop will just cancel out the pressure you got available to drive the system and air speed at the exit will simply be equal to the surrounding one.that 17% volume expansion ....is not even enough to fill the void cut into the air stream by the radiator which occupies surely more than 17% of the crossection of the duct at the start of the exit duct.It will help to fill the volume but not much more.
it's maybe a slightly counterintiutive, but when a gas accelerate through a nozzle, the velocity increase and the pressure and the gas density decrease, until we arrive at sound of speed, when flow's definitely chocked. And i don't think we are close to speed of sound at this renault. We don't have a regular nozzle either, but something close to it, maybe it works.
And output flow will be 17% quicker compared do "cold" radiators - regardless you use it tho blow difuser or not.
Yeah. Fluids do behave a little bit weird sometimes.marcush. wrote:I do not deny this.My pointis .will the heating be able to recover the speed lost in the radiator core?marekk wrote:Marcus,marcush. wrote:forget this ramming thing.You got a significant pressure drop through this duct even without a radiator.And the pressure drop will not go away by making the inlet bigger.
At a certain point of necking down the pressure drop will just cancel out the pressure you got available to drive the system and air speed at the exit will simply be equal to the surrounding one.that 17% volume expansion ....is not even enough to fill the void cut into the air stream by the radiator which occupies surely more than 17% of the crossection of the duct at the start of the exit duct.It will help to fill the volume but not much more.
it's maybe a slightly counterintiutive, but when a gas accelerate through a nozzle, the velocity increase and the pressure and the gas density decrease, until we arrive at sound of speed, when flow's definitely chocked. And i don't think we are close to speed of sound at this renault. We don't have a regular nozzle either, but something close to it, maybe it works.
And output flow will be 17% quicker compared do "cold" radiators - regardless you use it tho blow difuser or not.
My point is:putting the air through the duct will always have losses coming with it,there is no free lunch.undoubtedly you need exits for the hot air and inlet for the cold air in and the aim is to have as low losses as possible,not increasing the flow through the body to achieve something (stop -the f-duct was definetly doing exactly this ...)
Hey manchild, yea thats what I meant, though perhaps not worded so well. The parts you pointed out are indeed the torsion bars. I was referring to them while correcting furnik. The bar in question looks likes like a typical T type anti roll bar but I can't figure out how its operated. I didn't follow the post of Marcush very well but he seems to have at least investigated harder than I have!manchild wrote: Let's have a fight
No those are nor torsion bars.
Torsion bars are located above, longitudinally, starting where pointed and heading backward, with rockers attached to them. The extensions seen on pic operate the third damper if I'm not mistaken.
Wouldn't you like to know...furnik28 wrote: sorry how long have u been in f1 or do you play ps2 games
And your image also shows what I think must be a pitot tube coming out from above the splitter and running sideways accross the bib. I can't see the end of it though, so I suspect that it must continue under the bib.Blackout wrote:I posted it because it's the first photo where we can see the exhausts, the turning vanes, the bargeboards and the splitter clearly and how they are shaped...