I'm not sure it's so much late braking as heavy trail braking. I don't remember Massa being an especially late braker - but he always stood out whenever trail braking was a big issue. Sepang, Brazil, Turkey, Bahrain - all trail braking circuits.f1316 wrote:On the Massa being faster than Alonso thing, part of Massa's style has always been late-braking and I think that, much like with Lewis Hamilton, contributed to allowing him to heat of the tyres well. MSC in qualifying, likewise.
If you added up Vettel's best sectors in Hockenheim he would have beaten Alonso in Q3. If you added up Webber's best sector times at Silverstone he would have beaten Alonso in Q3. The Red Bull is definitely quick in the wet, and probably more so since the Singapore/Suzuka update.raymondu999 wrote: To be honest right now I think the Red Bull is underrated in the wet, and the Ferrari slightly overrated. The last competitive wet session in Hockenheim qualifying went to Ferrari - but it was very close, despite a Vettel mistake, and the Ferrari bolting on a fresh set of inters mid-Q3.
Rain could mix things up - but I don't think (in terms of Red Bull vs Ferrari) it will mix things up as much as people think it will. Nor in terms of the title race.
Nor do I. It would certainly help matters for Alonso, because anything that lends itself to unpredictability always helps the underdog. But, wet weather is far from a guarantee.raymondu999 wrote:yeah that's what I meant. People are writing off a wet race as handing the title to Alonso on a silver platter. Whereas I don't believe that will be the case.
If I'm reading you correctly - which I think I am - basically the rain is giving Vettel a bigger chance to c*ck it up. But I don't think it will hamper Vettel in terms of competitiveness, the way it sort of did (relative to Alonso's Ferrari) in Sepang.bhallg2k wrote:Nor do I. It would certainly help matters, because anything that lends itself to unpredictability always helps the underdog. But, wet weather is far from a guarantee.raymondu999 wrote:yeah that's what I meant. People are writing off a wet race as handing the title to Alonso on a silver platter. Whereas I don't believe that will be the case.
In 2005 his car was the best for the first 4 races. Once we got to Europe it seemed Mclaren had the edge, but Alonso was consistant and took full advantage of all the reliability problems that Mclaren had. However, he did win the last race in China.f1316 wrote:Alonso's never really been able to finish a season a huge high though. In 2005 it was more just making his points lead last and waiting for McLarens to explode, and 2006 was also really given to him by Schumi's retirements (again finishing behind Massa at Interlagos).
You could also argue that he's never had the fastest car, or maybe only for short periods, although 2007 was pretty close I think.
I think f1316 is talking more of "the last race" rather than "the last few races"Gerhard Berger wrote:In 2005 his car was the best for the first 4 races. Once we got to Europe it seemed Mclaren had the edge, but Alonso was consistant and took full advantage of all the reliability problems that Mclaren had. However, he did win the last race in China.f1316 wrote:Alonso's never really been able to finish a season a huge high though. In 2005 it was more just making his points lead last and waiting for McLarens to explode, and 2006 was also really given to him by Schumi's retirements (again finishing behind Massa at Interlagos).
You could also argue that he's never had the fastest car, or maybe only for short periods, although 2007 was pretty close I think.
In 2006 it was a tale of two halves. In the first half Renault was brilliant, in the second half Renault got overtaken by Ferrari.
2010 though, he finished the season very strongly.
Karthikeyan again?banibhusan wrote:I guess Massa should be faster than Alonso here. If that happens and Massa qualifies higher then Alonso then what strategies Ferrari will apply this time to benefit Alonso.