Heh, this post of yours made me recall an idea of mine. Let's look at the settled teams, which should produce a reasonable car. For example Hulkenberg is rated right now at 100:1, and Rubens is 125:1. Do you think that the probability of Hulkenberg WDC is really almost 1%? OK, maybe this wasn't the best choice, because maybe Williams does have an about 2% chance of producing a world beater.WhiteBlue wrote: The new teams do not pose any threat to the established teams. It is not likely that established mid field to lower half teams like Renault, BMW-Sauber, Williams, Force India and Toro Rosso will spring a surprise like Brawn did 2009. Their leading drivers carry odds typically twice or tenfold (40-100) of those seen by the second rated drivers of the top teams
Here's another example: Sebastian Buemi is tipped at 66:1. Really? I mean, how likely is it that last year's RBR plus minor tuning is quicker than this year's RBR? In such a case, would the speed differential be enough to allow Buemi to beat Vettel and Webber? Then again, how likely is it that it will be faster than McLaren, Ferrari and Mercedes?
For some reason, in a technology dominated event as is F1, I feel that the odds for the underdogs are incredibly low. It's possible that Button is the WDC with the lowest initial odds in history. I mean, it's technicaly possible that one of "my" electrons is at Jupiter right now. However, even if I have something around 10^28 electrons, it's very unlikely.
BTW: Is it me or is Bet & Win offering a meagre 2.5:1 for Alonso? I mean, we haven't even had our first qualifying session!