Interesting jack they're using there. Perhaps this is connected with the apparent lack of a metal hook plate as was normal for most cars in the last few years?zgred wrote:
Interesting jack they're using there. Perhaps this is connected with the apparent lack of a metal hook plate as was normal for most cars in the last few years?zgred wrote:
No.Onch wrote:Still convinced that the differences we see are due to the different angles/perspective, apart for the 'dummy' cameras which are missing in Jerez 1.
Also both Jerez pics are from a moving car, which could explain the narrower gap between the 2nd and 3rd elements closer to the center of the car (although the wing is not flexible, of course! )
The first R31 FW is more like a pre-Singapore 2010 wing...Blackout wrote:
My point was that I believe that the highlighted areas in the pics are all identical.Blackout wrote:No.
'The Barcelona 3 FW' shown by madly is the new wing witch has these endplates: (top)
The first R31 FW is more like a pre-Singapore 2010 wing...
That's the thing, I was wondering about. Why it's not flexing yet? Is this so hard to replicate?Onch wrote:(although the wing is not flexible, of course! )
Well I am confident that the wing is flexing... It was a (poor) attempt at an ironic comment about the current situation where wings are rigid when tested while everybody can see that they are moving at speed.mith wrote:That's the thing, I was wondering about. Why it's not flexing yet? Is this so hard to replicate?Onch wrote:(although the wing is not flexible, of course! )
Sadly, Madly didn't just highlighted the most important details and no, these FW are not identical. the differences are in the endplates (like I showed above), and the two upper wings.Onch wrote:My point was that I believe that the highlighted areas in the pics are all identical.Blackout wrote:No.
'The Barcelona 3 FW' shown by madly is the new wing witch has these endplates: (top)
The first R31 FW is more like a pre-Singapore 2010 wing...