They will have a spare, logistics won't factor. I'd be surprised if they don't change.
They will have a spare, logistics won't factor. I'd be surprised if they don't change.
What laptime do you think his medium run would have produced?MCLvamos wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 16:04Yep, but the car issue is on the team. I totally agree, Lando has himself to blame for yesterday, but the medium run would've got him through and there is no denying that failing to do that is on the team.organic wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 15:26Norris went back out earlier than others to do two attempts. It just so happened that he had a mistake on the first attempt and a yellow flag on the secondPikeStance wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 11:13I do not have a problem with boxing Norris on his lap, but if you going to do that, then you do not have the luxury of "running with the pack." He should have gone back out almost immediately. In the past, the first run in Q1 was generally good enough to be in the top 15. As someone once told me, if you put yourself in a position for something bad to happen, you have only yourself to blame when something does.
I don't get the discussion about the drivers. Ideally, we want them both on the podium and I don't care which. I don't think there is an issue with Norris so much as Piastri driving well. besides, what's the alternative to Norris? Going forward, it doesn't matter who's in front as long as the team comes first.
With the way track temperature was fluctuating, there was no guarantee that a soft run with >10mins left would be enough to go through
Besides, the elimination of Norris, now that the car issue has been confirmed, required: a car issue, a costly error, and a yellow flag
To me that can and does happen to any team. I don't think it was a blunder in terms of the calls McLaren made. The only blunder was the error on the 2nd fast lap when Norris shouldn't have been on the limit yet
What was the issue with the car?MCLvamos wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 16:04Yep, but the car issue is on the team. I totally agree, Lando has himself to blame for yesterday, but the medium run would've got him through and there is no denying that failing to do that is on the team.organic wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 15:26Norris went back out earlier than others to do two attempts. It just so happened that he had a mistake on the first attempt and a yellow flag on the secondPikeStance wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 11:13I do not have a problem with boxing Norris on his lap, but if you going to do that, then you do not have the luxury of "running with the pack." He should have gone back out almost immediately. In the past, the first run in Q1 was generally good enough to be in the top 15. As someone once told me, if you put yourself in a position for something bad to happen, you have only yourself to blame when something does.
I don't get the discussion about the drivers. Ideally, we want them both on the podium and I don't care which. I don't think there is an issue with Norris so much as Piastri driving well. besides, what's the alternative to Norris? Going forward, it doesn't matter who's in front as long as the team comes first.
With the way track temperature was fluctuating, there was no guarantee that a soft run with >10mins left would be enough to go through
Besides, the elimination of Norris, now that the car issue has been confirmed, required: a car issue, a costly error, and a yellow flag
To me that can and does happen to any team. I don't think it was a blunder in terms of the calls McLaren made. The only blunder was the error on the 2nd fast lap when Norris shouldn't have been on the limit yet
Not sure but that is why he was called in before the lap finished. Confirmed on McLaren's post quali reportmwillems wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 16:36What was the issue with the car?MCLvamos wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 16:04Yep, but the car issue is on the team. I totally agree, Lando has himself to blame for yesterday, but the medium run would've got him through and there is no denying that failing to do that is on the team.organic wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 15:26
Norris went back out earlier than others to do two attempts. It just so happened that he had a mistake on the first attempt and a yellow flag on the second
With the way track temperature was fluctuating, there was no guarantee that a soft run with >10mins left would be enough to go through
Besides, the elimination of Norris, now that the car issue has been confirmed, required: a car issue, a costly error, and a yellow flag
To me that can and does happen to any team. I don't think it was a blunder in terms of the calls McLaren made. The only blunder was the error on the 2nd fast lap when Norris shouldn't have been on the limit yet
Right. Not sure that they did anything wrong by calling him in though, but I'm sure we'll hear more.
"We had uncertainty on the fuel system that we needed to check.mwillems wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 16:36What was the issue with the car?MCLvamos wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 16:04Yep, but the car issue is on the team. I totally agree, Lando has himself to blame for yesterday, but the medium run would've got him through and there is no denying that failing to do that is on the team.organic wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 15:26
Norris went back out earlier than others to do two attempts. It just so happened that he had a mistake on the first attempt and a yellow flag on the second
With the way track temperature was fluctuating, there was no guarantee that a soft run with >10mins left would be enough to go through
Besides, the elimination of Norris, now that the car issue has been confirmed, required: a car issue, a costly error, and a yellow flag
To me that can and does happen to any team. I don't think it was a blunder in terms of the calls McLaren made. The only blunder was the error on the 2nd fast lap when Norris shouldn't have been on the limit yet
Thanks, team sound like they did the right thing.Tomsky wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 17:45"We had uncertainty on the fuel system that we needed to check.
"Therefore we decided to call the car in, have some time to check and then be ready to go on the final run on Softs, which in any case would have been the decisive run.
"So we thought rather than taking the risk that the problem actually forces us not to do the run on Softs, we just wanted to take the prudent approach and pull the car in."
https://racingnews365.com/mclaren-revea ... qualifying
Yeah, it sounds like we were a victim of unfortunate events.mwillems wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 17:51Thanks, team sound like they did the right thing.Tomsky wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 17:45"We had uncertainty on the fuel system that we needed to check.
"Therefore we decided to call the car in, have some time to check and then be ready to go on the final run on Softs, which in any case would have been the decisive run.
"So we thought rather than taking the risk that the problem actually forces us not to do the run on Softs, we just wanted to take the prudent approach and pull the car in."
https://racingnews365.com/mclaren-revea ... qualifying
Throughout the season, they've shown they are on top of things, so I trust they know what they are doing here.101FlyingDutchman wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 18:36If it seems sooooo obvious for keyboard warriors then clearly there is another very good reason we are not privy too wrt why they won’t change the engine today.
The team know what they’re doing. Show some faith