McLaren MP4-26 2011 – Fan Tail (Octopus) Exhaust

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
silversurf3r
0
Joined: 20 Oct 2011, 14:12

Re: McLaren MP4-26 Mercedes

Post

Hi guys. Scarbs just posted this link on Twitter to his blog. It's an analysis of the exhaust that never was! From a recent interview on TFL with Paddy Lowe.
http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/2012/05/3 ... s-exhaust/

Interesting reading anyway. Check it out.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: McLaren MP4-26 Mercedes

Post

I wonder how that system would've performed in the wet - it would heat up the track right ahead of the rear wheels. Traction would've been mega - and on the flipside, they would have to have a much higher crossover condition. (ie they'd have to wait for it to be wetter before they wet to wets - because their rears would be facing drier conditions than the other rears. Mind you - probably there would be a bit of understeer involved then too, as the fronts receive more water than the rears.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

hardingfv32
hardingfv32
35
Joined: 03 Apr 2011, 19:42

McLaren MP4-26 2011 – Fan Tail (Octopus) Exhaust

Post

Scrabs just posted a summary of this system.

There are a couple of states benefits: Feed flow to the diffuser and seal off the tire squirt.

Question: Why is exhaust feeding of the diffuser good while the flow around the tire (tire squirt) feeding the diffuser bad?

Brian

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: McLaren MP4-26 2011 – Fan Tail (Octopus) Exhaust

Post

Because tire squirt is unstable.
Image

Crucial_Xtreme
Crucial_Xtreme
404
Joined: 16 Oct 2011, 00:13
Location: Charlotte

Re: McLaren MP4-26 2011 – Fan Tail (Octopus) Exhaust

Post

hardingfv32 wrote:Scrabs just posted a summary of this system.

There are a couple of states benefits: Feed flow to the diffuser and seal off the tire squirt.

Question: Why is exhaust feeding of the diffuser good while the flow around the tire (tire squirt) feeding the diffuser bad?

Brian
Because "tyre squirt" is lateral air flow into the diffuser, this slows the flow through the diffuser which in turn robs the car of downforce.

aussiegman
aussiegman
105
Joined: 07 Feb 2012, 07:16
Location: Sydney, Hong Kong & BVI

Re: McLaren MP4-26 2011 – Fan Tail (Octopus) Exhaust

Post

As above, I think the issue would be the perpendicular direction of flow breaking up the surrounding air stream(s) and the resulting turbulence rather than any perceived instability of the air flow.

The fan tail seems to provide exhaust flow that can be more easily re-directed by the flow already present under the floor due to the angle at which it is directed and placement of the vent as opposed to the flow entering from tyre squirt which causes flow disruptions and turbulence.

Also, IMHO the exhaust flow could also be considered unstable to a certain degree as RPM changes within the boundaries of the engine operating range.
Never approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or an Idiot from any direction

User avatar
Shrieker
13
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 23:41

Re: McLaren MP4-26 Mercedes

Post

I asked the very same question about the 2011 Renault R31 (whether their exhaust blowing downwards would aid rear grip in the wet) and a fellow member did a quick calculation; the heat would be nowhere near enough to aid rear grip in the wet. The blowing effect is a different matter however. Still, I think even the blowing effect would not achieve much. Another quick calculation might prove so.
Education is that which allows a nation free, independent, reputable life, and function as a high society; or it condemns it to captivity and poverty.
-Atatürk

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: McLaren MP4-26 2011 – Fan Tail (Octopus) Exhaust

Post

I wonder how that system would've performed in the wet - it would heat up the track right ahead of the rear wheels. Traction would've been mega - and on the flipside, they would have to have a much higher crossover condition. (ie they'd have to wait for it to be wetter before they wet to wets - because their rears would be facing drier conditions than the other rears. Mind you - probably there would be a bit of understeer involved then too, as the fronts receive more water than the rears.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: McLaren MP4-26 2011 – Fan Tail (Octopus) Exhaust

Post

aussiegman wrote:Also, IMHO the exhaust flow could also be considered unstable to a certain degree as RPM changes within the boundaries of the engine operating range.
I don't think you're alone with that opinion. I think a few teams have discovered that the effects of the exhaust on the diffuser are, in fact, unstable and can be detrimental to performance (see: F2012, RB8). It's a whole new ballgame now that off-throttle blowing is heavily restricted and teams no longer have carte blanche to locate their exhausts for max effect.

The variables now are almost as numerous as those related to tire squirt, which itself changes depending on the wheels' rotational speed, orientation and shape, as well as the car's ground/air speed and proximity to other objects. Someone needs to come up with the exhaust equivalent of a wheel fairing.

@Ray, I don't know that the exhaust's effects on the temperature of the track would be noticeable at all.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: McLaren MP4-26 2011 – Fan Tail (Octopus) Exhaust

Post

Already had this exact same topic months ago:
Mclaren Mp4-26 "Fan tail" Exhaust
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=11850

I don't mean to brag, but I was the first to decipher what the exhaust was, back in February 2011. 8) Scarbsy didn't give me a shout out on the Flying lap though.. hahaha

Image
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028