So, with them set to go away, what do you think?
Some implementations were damn ugly, but some looked fine to me, and added a sense of character. So I won't cry a loss, but would remember some of the cars (and their noses) fondly.
I think they were a compromise between FIA and teams reducing nose height and leaving the team the high front bulkhead height (because I think the tubs were aleady in the final design process when the low nose regs came in).Holm86 wrote:I won't miss them at all. They were terribly ugly.
They were a great examble of FIA's bad thought through regulations.
That would've COMPLETELY altered the aerodynamics to the cars. The reason for the step was because they wanted lower noses, but all the teams pretty much had their tubs (with the higher bulkheads) dialed in already. These tubs, and the rest of the car, were designed to have a high nose to allow maximum air underneath and around the sidepods. Having a BGP nose would've essentially brought the nose so low that it would've disrupted the path of the air and affected the aero right through to the rear wing and diffusers. Had the FIA mandated BGP-like noses, we would not have had a 2012 season.Slife wrote:Why didn't the FIA mandate that the nose on the 2012 F1 cars be similar to the BGP001 nose ? It would look better, prevent t-boning drivers, and the lower nose would reduce downforce levels (which is one of the FIA's goals).