Dimming city lights

Post anything that doesn't belong in any other forum, including gaming and topics unrelated to motorsport. Site specific discussions should go in the site feedback forum.
mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Dimming city lights

Post

The City of Light dimmed? It’s true. Thanks to a new law, not only Paris but all of France will see its lighting level reduced, beginning this July. Window lighting in commercial buildings and the lights on building facades will be turned off after 1 a.m., and interior lighting in office buildings will be off an hour after the last employee departs.

The new law promises to reduce carbon emissions and save energy -- the annual equivalent of 750,000 households’ worth. Most significant is its potential to turn the tide against light pollution by changing attitudes about our unnecessary overuse of light at night.

In almost every U.S. city, suburb and town, the streets, parking lots, gas stations, and commercial and public buildings are lit through the night. Over recent decades, the growth of this pollution has been relentless, yet slow enough that most of us haven’t noticed. Parking lots and gas stations, for example, are now often 10 times brighter than they were just 20 years ago, and light pollution continues to grow at 6 percent every year.

The cost of all this light, monetary and otherwise, is high. The connections to sleep disorders, cancer, diabetes and other disease are serious enough that the American Medical Association has declared its support for light-pollution control efforts. Every ecosystem on Earth is both nocturnal as well as diurnal, and light destroys habitat just as easily as any bulldozer can. And when eight out of 10 children born in the U.S. today will never see the Milky Way, we have even lost the stars.
Safety Improves

The usual justification for these costs is that we need all this light for safety and security. This simply isn’t true.

No one doubts that artificial light can reduce the risks of being out at night, and no one is saying that we ought to exist in the dark. But increasingly, police, doctors, astronomers, economists, business leaders, communities and now the French government agree that we should reduce the light we use, and that too much brightness at night actually reduces our safety and security. Bright lights may make us feel safer. Alone, however, they don’t actually make us safer.

The research bears this out. In 2008, PG&E Corp. (PCG), the San Francisco-based energy company, reviewed the research and found “either that there is no link between lighting and crime, or that any link is too subtle or complex to have been evident in the data.”

Others are even more to the point. Australian astronomer Barry Clark went so far as to conclude that “advocating lighting for crime prevention is like advocating use of a flammable liquid to try to put out a fire.”

Our own eyes tell the same story. Too much light at night actually blinds us with “disability glare” -- something middle-aged and elderly drivers know all too well -- and bright, unshielded lights make it impossible to see past them to where criminals might hide. (The next time you face a bright streetlight, block it with your hand and notice how much better you can see the area beneath and beyond the light.)

Numerous villages, towns and cities in Europe and the U.S. have initiated programs to shut off streetlights for at least part of the night. European cities such as Berlin and Copenhagen already have much lower levels of light than their U.S. counterparts, and even some major American cities, such as Tucson, Arizona, have strict lighting ordinances that require a level of light that most Americans would consider dim. None of these towns and cities has reported related increases in crime.

The new French law is to be applauded, not only for what it may do to save energy and reduce carbon emissions, but also for what it may help us to understand: True safety and security at night comes from making smart decisions, being aware of our surroundings and using lighting wisely.

If the City of Light can do it, why shouldn’t we?
Bloomberg - Turn Down the City Lights and Make Streets Safer
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

The idea of turning off lights in empty buildings has been going through my mind for years now, so I can't fathom why in the world this is barely coming into play. I mean, what's the point of having nearly all of the lights on in empty office buildings? Sure, companies will save money if they turn off the lights at night (if not needed), but the most important end result from all of this is the huge decrease in power production.

I'm not a fanatic tree hugger, but I think that we should all do our part on a day to day basis, even if it's a small contribution.

I can't wait until I don't see countless lights turned on at night in my local city, hopefully it's sooner rather than later!
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

User avatar
Cam
45
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 08:38

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

mx_tifoso wrote: I mean, what's the point of having nearly all of the lights on in empty office buildings?
The same technique is used in F1 to force tracks to pay high prices to host races when no-one turns up to watch.

As long as someone is getting paid, they're in no rush to get you stop paying them - no matter how unviable or wasteful it is.
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.”
― Socrates
Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorant describes a person in the state of being unaware
who deliberately ignores or disregards important information or facts. © all rights reserved.

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

Yeah I realize that but it's very sad how the mentality is changing at a very slow pace. There is so much that we can do to consume less energy without having to even worry as much about how we produce it. And not that the production side isn't important but I think that the focus should be equivalent in terms of what we do with the energy.

Companies go "green" by recycling but still leave all of the lights on at night 365 days a year. #-o
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
645
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

most French electricity comes from nuclear plant
so, where would the carbon saving come from ?

conventional wisdom is that most large power plant is inefficient at partial power
(there is lots of standby plant used in daytime, this is inefficient at all powers)
so, in a sense, the wasteage due to night lighting is less than it seems

does anyone out there have firmer (inside) information on this ?
dispersing demand peaks via staggered time zones would benefit the subject of this thread

as a (retired) design engineer I wonder why nuclear power is admirable in France and the opposite in Germany
I also wonder why politicians think they are fit to, in effect, design power plants (and even motor vehicles)

BTW many customers in the UK pay inflated charges to the power companies (many of these French or German owned)
such charges subsidise under-pricing in France and Germany (against EU rules)

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

Thank you guys for your insight, I really appreciate it.

And I do remember having previously read about how plants are inefficient at partial power, so I'm glad that you brought it up Tommy.

But btw, please do your best to avoid politics, energy production rants, and other topics of that nature.
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

The heat produced by lighting in a large building can be substantial, and is included in the calculations for the HVAC loads, along with the heat produced by office equipment and the peoples themselves. I have heard of buildings in which the lighting and HVAC systems were so integrated that even doing something like switching to more energy efficient bulbs required a complete overhaul of the HVAC system. That's surely rare (in one case, air had been ducted through the light fixtures themselves - a radically green design at the time no doubt) but it shows that it's not always as simple as flipping a light switch. In fact, it's not unusual in older office buildings to find that there just aren't any light switches - only breaker boxes in the electrical rooms for each floor.

Smokes
Smokes
4
Joined: 30 Mar 2010, 17:47

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

only problem is street crime will go up. As oppotunist take advantage of darkness and drunk party goers.

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

Excellent info, Pup.

So while "dimming the lights" have a short term effect in terms of cost due to the revised HVAC requirements, it would be beneficial in the long term and be fruitful in the collective sense. I think it's time to really begin thinking like that, since it is not as prevalent in the US as it might be in other countries (to think of the entire community instead of the individual).
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Dimming city lights

Post

Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.