beelsebob wrote:
Except that they can't run bigger wing angles, because unlike with DRS, the switch only affects you at very high speeds. The f-duct worked wonders at Spa because you could open it coming out of the hairpin and use it all the way down to the end of the Kemmel straight. By comparison, the DRD would be closed until most of the way down the kemmel straight, and that big ass rear wing will be hurting you all the way. In order for DRD to be effective, you need to be able to tune it to open at fairly low speeds, and not have it compromise any corners. That means it'll be great at Monza, where the worst you have to deal with is the entry to parabolica, but at Spa, it's not useful at all.
While the teams would happily take 0.05 seconds, they'll gain more than 0.05 seconds by setting the car up properly in practice, instead of spending their time tuning a DRD.
At lower speeds, the drag coming off the wing isn't that great. It'll hamper acceleration a bit yes, bit I think the gains outweight the disadvantages. Especially because almost all of the corners where you need the rear wing downforce are concentrated in one sector. Almost the other corners, with the exception of chicanes, are so high speed that the diffuser is more then enough to produce the necessary DF. It makes life concerning set up a little bit easier too. I feel it is even possible to stall the rear wing at Pouhon.. So you can set the stalling speed rather low, perhaps even at 250 km/h.
Set up of the DRD is of course always a problem. That same will also be true for Monza. But if it works, they should do it. No questions asked.