Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Breaking news, useful data or technical highlights or vehicles that are not meant to race. You can post commercial vehicle news or developments here.
Please post topics on racing variants in "other racing categories".
User avatar
MOWOG
24
Joined: 07 Apr 2013, 15:46
Location: Rhode Island, USA

Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

Interesting development from the lads at Toyota R&D. A two stroke engine with a W shaped piston? :wtf: Read all about it here.


Toyota Central R&D developing free-piston engine linear generator; envisioning multi-FPEG units for electric drive vehicles


22 April 2014

Image


A team at Toyota Central R&D Labs Inc. is developing a prototype 10 kW Free Piston Engine Linear Generator (FPEG) featuring a thin and compact build, high efficiency and high fuel flexibility. Toyota envisions that a pair of such units (20 kW) would enable B/C-segment electric drive vehicles to cruise at 120 km/h (75 mph). The team presented two papers on the state of their work at the recent SAE 2014 World Congress in Detroit.

The FPEG consists of a two-stroke combustion chamber, a linear generator and a gas spring chamber. The piston is moved by the combustion gas, while magnets attached to the piston move within a linear coil, thereby converting kinetic energy to electrical energy. The main structural feature of the Toyota FPEG is a hollow circular step-shaped piston, which Toyota calls “W-shape”. The smaller-diameter side of the piston constitutes a combustion chamber, and the larger-diameter side constitutes a gas spring chamber.

FPEGs are attractive for a number of reasons, the Toyota researchers note, including thermal efficiency, low friction, and low vibration. Two basic design approaches have emerged: the first is a structure with two opposed combustion chambers; the second, a structure with one combustion chamber and one gas spring chamber. In the latter approach, the gas spring chamber is responsible for returning the piston for the subsequent combustion event. This second configuration is the one selected by Toyota for further investigation by both numerical simulation and experimentation.

The Toyota FPEG is based on a double piston system; at one end is the combustion chamber, and at the other, the adjustable gas spring chamber. Burned gas is scavenged out through exhaust valves mounted in the cylinder head of the combustion chamber; fresh air is brought in through the scavenging port at the side wall of the cylinder liner.

A portion of the kinetic energy of the piston is stored in the gas spring, and extracted on the return stroke to the combustion chamber side. A magnetic “mover” is mounted at the outer periphery of the piston; the mover and the stator coils together comprise the linear generator component of the FPEG.

Image

The “W-shape” piston design offers several advantages, Toyota says:

The larger cross-sectional area of the gas spring chamber leads to lower compression temperature of the gas spring chamber and consequently decreased heat loss.

The piston has a hollow structure and moves along a column stay, which in turn enables the construction of a cooling oil passage within the stay. The key technologies to deliver stable continuous operation of an FPEG are lubricating, cooling, and control logic. (The Toyota team’s second paper deals exclusively with the control system.)

The inner periphery of the hollow piston also serves as a sliding surface on the column stay, enabling a steady small clearance between the magnets and coil for improved generating efficiency.

The magnet is set far from the piston top, preventing magnet degaussing by heating.

The researchers developed a one-dimensional cycle simulation to investigate the performance of the proposed structure, and used it to assess spark ignition combustion (SI) and premixed charged compression ignition combustion (PCCI). They achieved output power of 10 kW with both SI and PCCI combustion cases; the PCCI combustion case realized 42% thermal efficiency.

They then constructed an FPEG prototype with a uni-flow scavenging type, two-stroke SI combustion system as an experimental study. They used ceramic-coated piston rings and cylinder liner they developed in order to ensure the smooth sliding of the piston even under insufficient lubrication. Poppet valves seated in a water-cooled cylinder head were actuated by hydraulic valve trains to control exhaust valve timing. Direct injection reduced unburned hydrocarbon emissions exhausted through the scavenging process.

A pressure regulating valve in the gas spring chamber enabled a variable gas mass, thereby varying the stiffness of the gas springs—one of the variables to shift the FPEG to different operating points.

The linear generator was a permanently excited synchronous machine consisting of the stationary coil, the mover (based on neodymium-iron-boron magnets) attached to the piston, and iron-cored stator. The poer electronics drive the machine as both a motor and a generator.

The researchers designed the prototype control system to ensure that the compression ratio was kept to the values which enable stable combustions—i.e., the generating load coefficient is variable, not constant. The coefficient is determined by a feedback control method based on the postion and velocity of the piston.

As there is no crank mechanism, the piston position in an FPEG is not defined with crank angle. However, knowing the piston position is critical not only to timings (fuel injection, ignition, opening/closing exhaust valves), but also to mode selections of driving or generating. To determine piston position, the Toyota researchers count plural-lines grooves engraved on the side surface of the piston body with gap sensors fixed on the inner wall of the cylinder block. (The detailed method of detecting and controlling piston position is the subject of the second paper.)

The generator control logic must meet the following requirements, according to the researchers:

Assuming a multi-unit vehicle application, the multiple FPEGs would cancel out vibration through a horizontally opposed layout; the frequency and phase of the piston oscillation should be controllable.

TDC and BDC need to be precisely controlled for stabilizing two-stroke combustion.

After knocking or misfire, the oscillation must continue robustly.

The prototype FPEG with W-shape piston and two-stroke SI combustion system achieved stable operation for more than 4 hours without any cooling and lubricating problems.

The experimental analysis also showed that the precise control of ignition position is essential for stable operation of the FPEG.

In future work, the research team plans to improve the power generation of the system and to perform a quantitative analysis of the efficiency.

For more information on the engineering and to watch a video of how the engine works, view the source document at Green Car Congress

Editorial Aside: Ahem. This is the kind of innovation that Formula One COULD encourage if it wasn't so bound and determined to prohibit any and all innovation by its rigidly controlled and tightly written technical regs. Just sayin'..... :idea:
Some men go crazy; some men go slow. Some men go just where they want; some men never go.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

If it works, we'll see it in Formula One in 2050.

BanMeToo
BanMeToo
6
Joined: 27 Dec 2013, 16:26
Location: USA

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

You mean after years of competitive development in the auto industry allow it to trickle down into..... wait a minute! :P

User avatar
lkocev
5
Joined: 25 Jan 2009, 08:34

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

BanMeToo wrote:You mean after years of competitive development in the auto industry allow it to trickle down into..... wait a minute! :P
Hahaha, oh boy that's quite funny.

On a serious note, I don't see what the big deal is about this, its a mechanism that burns gasoline to generate electrical energy. The thermal efficiency seems high though so maybe there is something in that. But other than that, nothing revolutionary.

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

It would integrate into my ESERU nicely, perhaps I should talk to them.
No, that would mean another damn flight to Japan.

It looks good.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

German DLR ist currently working on a similar Project :


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HmxNazMJVI

[youtube] <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/7HmxNazMJVI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> [/youtube]


also very interesting Project and a bit of history to the theme ...the author is related to one of the great linear freepiston/Generator pioneers -Huber who worked at pescara Engines (in France ).Pescara was the Inventor of the linear engine -Huber was the engineer to make it happen .It was the fourth big concept of combustion engines -Otto,diesel,Wankel and Pescara ...and still valid todays.

http://www.freikolben.ch/37401/109985.html
http://www.freikolben.ch/37401/index.html



linear Generators are nothing new ...Volvo worked on something as well .

Most Projects fail to acknowledge the Problem of heat degrading the magnetic force using permanent magnets

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
642
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

IIRC the reduction of magnetic flux density with raised temperature is a temporary issue (it recovers as temperatures fall)
the practical effect would be a disruption of the generator control voltage/load calibration needed for correct piston action
more expensive types of magnetic material are much less affected by this
I think Toyota mean is that they can use a less expensive magnetic material if they keep it cooler
and manufacturers want to reduce their commercial vulnerability to dependency on rare earth magnets

highlighted is a need for best piston guidance/location to minimise the motor 'air gap' (clearance between armature and magnets)
air gap is the dominant cause of inefficiency in the magnetic circuit, linear machines eg motors are usually poor in this respect

this type of engine can include exhaust recovery turbine, eg more likely if SI or if switching CI-to-SI with mep

User avatar
Powerslide
10
Joined: 12 Feb 2006, 08:19
Location: Land Below The Wind

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

someone should tell toyota, even they cant beat the wheel. free reciprocation using energized pressure to control mass when it reaches the end is not efficient at all. using bmep or combustion to stop the piston moving towards it is already a huge energy factor itself. think the strain connecting rods take, off the chart amount of g-force and that alone would take away a lot of combustion energy. what a waste and that W piston does not look lightweight at all.
speed

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

Tommy Cookers wrote:IIRC the reduction of magnetic flux density with raised temperature is a temporary issue (it recovers as temperatures fall)
the practical effect would be a disruption of the generator control voltage/load calibration needed for correct piston action
more expensive types of magnetic material are much less affected by this
I think Toyota mean is that they can use a less expensive magnetic material if they keep it cooler
and manufacturers want to reduce their commercial vulnerability to dependency on rare earth magnets

highlighted is a need for best piston guidance/location to minimise the motor 'air gap' (clearance between armature and magnets)
air gap is the dominant cause of inefficiency in the magnetic circuit, linear machines eg motors are usually poor in this respect

this type of engine can include exhaust recovery turbine, eg more likely if SI or if switching CI-to-SI with mep
shouldn't be able to extract almost all energy with the piston? I mean the speed, load, etc. is not fixed so you can
vary the "load" on the piston through the combustion stroke to extract the most energy

Magnetic material that can handle higher temperatures are not only more expensive it is also weaker
and one you hit a certain temperature the loss of magnetic strength is permanent

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

Powerslide wrote:someone should tell toyota, even they cant beat the wheel. free reciprocation using energized pressure to control mass when it reaches the end is not efficient at all. using bmep or combustion to stop the piston moving towards it is already a huge energy factor itself. think the strain connecting rods take, off the chart amount of g-force and that alone would take away a lot of combustion energy. what a waste and that W piston does not look lightweight at all.
I don't think you'll need pressure to control the mass, you can use the generator, think of it as KERS

User avatar
Powerslide
10
Joined: 12 Feb 2006, 08:19
Location: Land Below The Wind

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

langwadt wrote:I don't think you'll need pressure to control the mass, you can use the generator, think of it as KERS
They use pressure. Look at the illustration, at the bottom of the system is air chambers with valve controls which acts as pneumatic springs and later, I assume, air is to be sent to the 2 stroke scavenging ports. Maybe on Top Dead Center it will use regenerative energy to stop the piston but I doubt it would be enough unless of course, its runs at very low rp/m
speed

User avatar
Callum
6
Joined: 18 Jan 2009, 15:03
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

Now, the air at the 'bottom' of the cylinder is acting as a pneumatic spring. Do you think it would be possible to use this compressed air (on the downstroke) to act as charged air for the combustion cycle? (obviously you would need to vent in 'fresh air' to allow the piston to move back up to TDC but it seems a waste to do all this work in compressing the air and then getting no benefit from it.

Thoughts?

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

Powerslide wrote:
langwadt wrote:I don't think you'll need pressure to control the mass, you can use the generator, think of it as KERS
They use pressure. Look at the illustration, at the bottom of the system is air chambers with valve controls which acts as pneumatic springs and later, I assume, air is to be sent to the 2 stroke scavenging ports. Maybe on Top Dead Center it will use regenerative energy to stop the piston but I doubt it would be enough unless of course, its runs at very low rp/m
the whole point of the engine is regenerative braking the piston on the combustion stroke, the will of cause be some pneumatic spring action going on in the bottom chamber but you can regulate so it is only what is need for the scavenging, no different that a "normal" two-stroke really

at the top dead center the combustion should stop and reverse the piston

It is interesting that with the motor-generator you can basically run it at any speed you like and with variable compression ratio and valve timing

User avatar
Powerslide
10
Joined: 12 Feb 2006, 08:19
Location: Land Below The Wind

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

A 1kg piston at 3,000 rp/m with a stroke of 3 inches and rod length of 10 inches has a piston force inertia of 845ibs. At 3,000 rp/m, with this W piston it is a lot more to stop. Now obviously electric friction is the idea or difficulty to move the piston, if we were to assume that the electro magnet can stop 845ibs then it would need a huge brake means effective pressure to push it down or vice versa. Of course, we then have to assume that, the system can tighten up when the piston heads towards TDC or BDC but as it starts to change direction, the electro magnet would easy its relay so the combustion can bring it down again and once at speeds it will increase friction to stop the piston. If this is the case then we have something. But if 845ibs is correct then I will assume that the combustion will play its role in stopping the piston which would be an energy waste compared to a spinning system which is energy free with movement.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculate- ... Piston.php
speed

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: Toyota Linear Generator Hybrid Engine.

Post

Powerslide wrote:A 1kg piston at 3,000 rp/m with a stroke of 3 inches and rod length of 10 inches has a piston force inertia of 845ibs. At 3,000 rp/m, with this W piston it is a lot more to stop. Now obviously electric friction is the idea or difficulty to move the piston, if we were to assume that the electro magnet can stop 845ibs then it would need a huge brake means effective pressure to push it down or vice versa. Of course, we then have to assume that, the system can tighten up when the piston heads towards TDC or BDC but as it starts to change direction, the electro magnet would easy its relay so the combustion can bring it down again and once at speeds it will increase friction to stop the piston. If this is the case then we have something. But if 845ibs is correct then I will assume that the combustion will play its role in stopping the piston which would be an energy waste compared to a spinning system which is energy free with movement.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculate- ... Piston.php
afaict that is all assuming you have to follow the standard sinusoidal motion

how about this:

3000rpm, 7.5cm stroke, 1kg piston assembly => 3000/60 * 0.075*2 => 7.5m/s average

0.5 * 1kg * 7.5^2 = 28 joule => 28joule * ((2*3000rpm)/60sec) = 2800Watt

even if you double or triple that the generator should be able to extract much more energy than that