Fans for downforce

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
Tom
0
Joined: 13 Jan 2006, 00:24
Location: Bicester

Post

On the subject of fans, if the Brabham was so magnificent and was glued to the track, why didn't everyone have one? Instead they banned it.

Ground effects I can understand are dangerouse if the car gets at all airbourne, but things like Active Suspension and the fan idea are technological masterpieces. Ban TC and race refuelling (why bother with V8s?), reintroduce Active Suspension, Fans and 4s pit stops.
Murphy's 9th Law of Technology:
Tell a man there are 300 million stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.

dumrick
dumrick
0
Joined: 19 Jan 2004, 13:36
Location: Portugal

Post

Fans were used for gound effect and have exactly the same risks. And, in my opinion, passive ground effect is a lot smarter than fans, because it relies solely on the displacement of the vehicle in the airflow and doesn't "steal" any power from the engine.
The use of fans in the Brabham BT49 was due to the fact that Brabham was the only team who had a boxer 12 engine (the Alfa Romeo) that, because of that configuration, didn't allow free space in the sidepods to get as much ground effect as their competition, that had the Cosworth V8's. Furthermore, the engine was more powerful then the Cossies, which contributed for teh fact that the power stolen by the fan wasn't such a big deal...

User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Post

Thanks, Dumrick, well explained, I did not know it.

If you want to become a fan of active suspension and fan-cars, let me explain that FISA and FOCA battled in the 80's for more turbo power (FISA's best technology) and downforce (Bernie's FOCA equalizer for their underpowered Cosworths). This made the races to reach high levels of G-forces.

I always heard rumours about Patrick Depallier death at Hockenheim in 1980 being caused by black out because of high G-forces. Then, you had Gilles Villeneuve and his teammate (I do not remember his name right now) dead in their Ferrari's. This brought some sense into the FOCA approach of maximum downforce.

So this is the short answer: driver's auxiliaries do not only take away excitement from this sport, they too can take away the lives of some drivers.

Late edit: the name of Villeneuve's teammate was Didier Pironi.

Later edit: the rules include a section on how to establish when a material ceases to be of a certain class because it has alloys or inclusions. No time to re-read it now, but probably can help you to clarify if a carbon rim makes the wheel non-metallic.

Anyway, for what I remember of the rules on alloys, they are restrictive, no permissive. So, I agree with Manchild. I fail to see how a carbon rim can be included in an all-metallic rim.
Ciro

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Post

Tom wrote:On the subject of fans, if the Brabham was so magnificent and was glued to the track, why didn't everyone have one? Instead they banned it.
Indeed, but those were times when FIA was impartial and honnest.

dumrick
dumrick
0
Joined: 19 Jan 2004, 13:36
Location: Portugal

Post

Ciro Pabón wrote:Then, you had Gilles Villeneuve and his teammate (I do not remember his name right now) dead in their Ferrari's.
Late edit: the name of Villeneuve's teammate was Didier Pironi.
Just to set the records straight: Pironi didn't die in a Ferrari. His accident at the Hockenheim's qualifying in 1982 broke his two legs and saw him through 34 surgeries in the following years to try to get fit again for F1. He was trying to get a competitive team to get back when he died in 1987, in an Off-Shore boat race accident, if I recall correctly.

And what a magnificent talent Pironi was... as a small child, I remember his battles with Villeneuve (my idol), they were superb...

User avatar
Tom
0
Joined: 13 Jan 2006, 00:24
Location: Bicester

Post

Ciro Pabón wrote:
Then, you had Gilles Villeneuve and his teammate (I do not remember his name right now) dead in their Ferrari's.
Late edit: the name of Villeneuve's teammate was Didier Pironi.


Just to set the records straight: Pironi didn't die in a Ferrari. His accident at the Hockenheim's qualifying in 1982 broke his two legs and saw him through 34 surgeries in the following years to try to get fit again for F1. He was trying to get a competitive team to get back when he died in 1987, in an Off-Shore boat race accident, if I recall correctly.
You recall corectly.

Pironi's last lap overtake of Villenurve at Tosa hairpin, Imola, led to the two never talking again. Many believe that Villenure's fatal accident at Zolder, the next meet in after Imola, was due to him trying too hard to beat Pironi's qualifying time. Incidently many believe Pironi's crash in which he shattered both anckls at Hockenheim in the wet was due to him thinking of Villenurve.

Pironi did enter powerboat racing and sadly died along with his co-pilot off the Isles of White on August 23 1987

Didier Pironi won 3 races, achieved 13 podiums, and scored a total of 101 championship points. He also secured 4 pole positions.
Murphy's 9th Law of Technology:
Tell a man there are 300 million stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.

User avatar
Steven
Owner
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 18:32
Location: Belgium

Post

The Brabham car was so effective it won its first race with 34 seconds ahead of any other car. It was indeed banned by Ecclestone and the Formula One Constructors Association (FOCA)

Image

I think it was a good decision to ban fans like these. In term of a collision, such a fan with high speed could well be a very dangerous projectile

ps: If anyone want to write something about this car, I'll add it to the "all cars ever" page ;)

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Post

..and it could mince modern CF noses like old bread :lol:

User avatar
Tom
0
Joined: 13 Jan 2006, 00:24
Location: Bicester

Post

They would find a way of protecting it better and making a gaurd that doesn't cause loss of power but stops stones being thrown up.

What effect would it have on slip streaming?
Murphy's 9th Law of Technology:
Tell a man there are 300 million stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.

Mikey_s
Mikey_s
8
Joined: 21 Dec 2005, 11:06

Post

my recollection of the issue is that other drivers complained that they were bombarded by 'projectiles' from the back of the car when they got close - it needn't just be stones - just look at all the marbles and other rubbish you get on the track...
Mike

User avatar
NickT
2
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 12:47
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Post

Mikey you are correct there were a lot of complaints from other drivers.

One note of interest though, the fan was primarly designed for cooling the engine :shock: by pulling air from under the car and then through the radiators. I remember seeing an interview with the designer afterwards where he sighted that a damaged skirt upset the airflow and caused an over heating problem with the car. So the downforce created was secondry, yeah right :twisted:
NickT

scarbs
scarbs
393
Joined: 08 Oct 2003, 09:47
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Post

Forix summary kind of sums up the facts.
http://www.forix.com/8w/fancar.html
It was indeed banned by Ecclestone and the Formula One Constructors Association (FOCA
)
Erm..? Bernie Ecclestone was the Brabham boss at the time and head of FOCA, it was FISA (later to become the FIA) the governing body who banned it.

I recall it had to have a sprag clutch on the fan drive shaft to prevent the fan coming to a dead halt shoud the engien stop while on track.

Bernie still owns and occaisionally runs the BT46B.

User avatar
Tom
0
Joined: 13 Jan 2006, 00:24
Location: Bicester

Post

I think the complaints about debris being picked up were the other drivers attempts to get it banned.

The tyres will bring up as much dirt and no one complains about them.
Murphy's 9th Law of Technology:
Tell a man there are 300 million stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.