In these photos, the white car is Turbo S and the blue one is the Turbo model








I know its just marketing, and I would a company like Kia or Hyundai to take advantage of the situation you're talking aboutJust_a_fan wrote: ↑09 Sep 2019, 11:15The Turbo badge is pure marketing because it matches the hierarchy of the rest of their range. The "overboost" feature is likewise marketing. There is no boost to "over", of course, but it's something that non-tech buyers can understand / brag about in the pub.
It's funny how many car buyers don't have a clue about the oily parts. There was a survey of BMW 1-series buyers in the UK a few years ago. Something like 80% thought the car was front wheel drive. The 1-series is of course rear wheel drive (except for one version in China) and BMW make much of the dynamics of rear wheel drive. All of it wasted on the typical car buyer who looks at the badge, the price and the toys.![]()
![]()
Hmmm, I don’t agree, Porsche never been the performance on paper type of brand, it’s much more about drivability. And that is exactly what they are claiming now.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑09 Sep 2019, 20:23With the technology out there now for several years, I would have expected someone like Porsche to bring a car that would be unrivaled, especially in terms of performance.
Not considering the looks, they seem to have brought a car that doesn’t surpass the Tesla cars... Performance, Features and Range are the 3 aspects that not only a Porsche (but also a higher price tag) should have been “Top of the Class” and that’s not what we are getting.
It is great to see them get into the EV realm though and hopefully others will follow them and we could really have improvements moving forward through the development that established car manufactures could bring.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I would argue that Porsche is a synonym of performance... And that’s that they cars have always aimed for... Even in the SUV space, the Cayenne Turbo is the leader in the segment, the Panamera Turbo is also leader in it’s segment... That’s not considering the 911 in their different performance configurations.Jolle wrote:Hmmm, I don’t agree, Porsche never been the performance on paper type of brand, it’s much more about drivability. And that is exactly what they are claiming now.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑09 Sep 2019, 20:23With the technology out there now for several years, I would have expected someone like Porsche to bring a car that would be unrivaled, especially in terms of performance.
Not considering the looks, they seem to have brought a car that doesn’t surpass the Tesla cars... Performance, Features and Range are the 3 aspects that not only a Porsche (but also a higher price tag) should have been “Top of the Class” and that’s not what we are getting.
It is great to see them get into the EV realm though and hopefully others will follow them and we could really have improvements moving forward through the development that established car manufactures could bring.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
And none of those cars having leading power figures in their segment; but if i were a betting man, I would say the Taycan will be the leader in driving dynamics in its segment. Looking at the ring time it is only something like 10-15s away from the time a Carrera GT achieved 10 or so years ago, and this is a 2200kg 4 door electric saloon.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑09 Sep 2019, 21:02I would argue that Porsche is a synonym of performance... And that’s that they cars have always aimed for... Even in the SUV space, the Cayenne Turbo is the leader in the segment, the Panamera Turbo is also leader in it’s segment... That’s not considering the 911 in their different performance configurations.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
But that is the one from Porsche… The Macan costs more than an Audi Q5 and they are very related. Audi will have almost the same car, with the price aimed at Tesla.alexx_88 wrote: ↑10 Sep 2019, 12:12It's a 2200kg 4-door saloon. Realistically, tracking a $180,000 pig of a car isn't high on the priority list for most customers. I'd say range is more important than whether or not it can do 10 or 20 0-100km/h launches without going into limp mode.
But yes, I fully agree with a previous poster. Everyone (in my circles at least) was talking about how Tesla with their tiny R&D budgets will be destroyed once the traditional manufacturers cast their eyes at the EV market. Porsche has done it and instead of offering just a better Model S for the same price (base model that they promised), they went all out with a car that's almost 2x more expensive and, frankly, not that impressive when you factor in what a car startup from California was able to do.
Maybe you´re using Tesla numbers as a reference for standard cars, but they´re not. Ignore Tesla, according to the first site I´ve seen providing quarter mile numbers, GT3 depending if manual or automatic takes 11.5 or 11.1 seconds. This Taycan takes 11.1 or 10.8 secondsSmallSoldier wrote: ↑09 Sep 2019, 20:23With the technology out there now for several years, I would have expected someone like Porsche to bring a car that would be unrivaled, especially in terms of performance.
Not considering the looks, they seem to have brought a car that doesn’t surpass the Tesla cars... Performance, Features and Range are the 3 aspects that not only a Porsche (but also a higher price tag) should have been “Top of the Class” and that’s not what we are getting.
Sorry but... Tesla a car startup from California? Ok, technically yes, but I don´t think any company founded by same person as Paypal or SpaceX should really be defined as a startup