Monaco Aero

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
ginsu
ginsu
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2006, 02:23

Monaco Aero

Post

Since Monaco is the highest downforce circuit, we see some interesting updates.

BMW Sauber have double element on their crash structure. Talk about using all the available space!

Image

Macca have H-Beam wing (may not be new for Monaco), but this is the first time I've seen Macca with the fairings behind their driveshafts (I know they did not have them earlier this year).

Image

Ferrari have probably the smallest gurney flaps I've ever seen, can't be more than 5mm. I think this is the first time they've appeared on the upper element. And a good picture of the device attached to the bottom, it's supposed to help clean up the airflow.
F1.com Tech Analysis wrote: The upper profiles have also been revised, with small vertical fins (yellow arrows) added, to increase pressure in the profiles' outermost sections. They also help to better direct airflow towards the barge boards and sidepod inlets.
Image
I love to love Senna.

mahesh248
mahesh248
0
Joined: 05 Mar 2007, 12:05
Location: India

Post

all team are looking forward to develop overall Down force ..BMW's and Mclaren look quite interesting ...

User avatar
ds.raikkonen
8
Joined: 04 Apr 2007, 08:11

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

ginsu wrote:Since Monaco is the highest downforce circuit, we see some interesting updates.
Surely you mean lowest downforce right?
“Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary...that’s what gets you.” - JC

modbaraban
modbaraban
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 17:44
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

ds.raikkonen wrote:
ginsu wrote:Since Monaco is the highest downforce circuit, we see some interesting updates.
Surely you mean lowest downforce right?
Surely you mean lowest grip right?

User avatar
m3_lover
0
Joined: 26 Jan 2006, 07:29
Location: St.Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Post

[IMG:720:480]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/ ... p-0188.jpg[/img]

wouldn't you want the chimmney opening to be as wide as possible to get as much hot air as possible out?
Simon: Nils? You can close in now. Nils?
John McClane: [on the guard's phone] Attention! Attention! Nils is dead! I repeat, Nils is dead, ----head. So's his pal, and those four guys from the East German All-Stars, your boys at the bank? They're gonna be a little late.
Simon: [on the phone] John... in the back of the truck you're driving, there's $13 billon dollars worth in gold bullion. I wonder would a deal be out of the question?
John McClane: [on the phone] Yeah, I got a deal for you. Come out from that rock you're hiding under, and I'll drive this truck up your ass.

User avatar
joseff
11
Joined: 24 Sep 2002, 11:53

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

ds.raikkonen wrote:Surely you mean lowest downforce right?
modbaraban wrote:Surely you mean lowest grip right?
IMHO you're both right there. Lowest grip because it's a street circuit, lowest downforce due to the low speeds.

modbaraban
modbaraban
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 17:44
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Post

But ginsu meant highest downforce (as a setup priority) in the first place :wink:

kilcoo316
kilcoo316
21
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 16:45
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

ginsu wrote:Ferrari have probably the smallest gurney flaps I've ever seen, can't be more than 5mm. I think this is the first time they've appeared on the upper element. And a good picture of the device attached to the bottom, it's supposed to help clean up the airflow.

You talking about the vertical plate under the wing 1st element?


Its a wing fence, reduces spanwise flow and will increase downforce.



Interesting that they aren't running the wing as close to the ground as they can though isn't it. (obviously if they can stick that under it the wing could drop down)

ginsu
ginsu
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2006, 02:23

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

joseff wrote:
ds.raikkonen wrote:Surely you mean lowest downforce right?
modbaraban wrote:Surely you mean lowest grip right?
IMHO you're both right there. Lowest grip because it's a street circuit, lowest downforce due to the low speeds.
Yes, the speeds are low, so the total downforce produced is low compared to high speed circuits. But, the Angle of Attack for the rear wings are usually at their largest, to get the most downforce possible.
You talking about the vertical plate under the wing 1st element?
Yea, I've seen similar devices on airplane wings. And my understanding is that they prevent the flow from traveling perpendicular to the cord. This is what 'reducing spanwise flow' means, right? My question is, does this 'fence' really work for high speed conditions or low speed?

To clarify, I thought on airplanes the fences were used primarily for the transonic regime, not low speed. So, I'm a little surprised to see it on an F1 car. Although, those 'slot gap' separators on the rear wing are increasingly looking like fences too!
I love to love Senna.

User avatar
m3_lover
0
Joined: 26 Jan 2006, 07:29
Location: St.Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Post

Why is there a second cap for cooling the driver..is this second hole needed to cool the power steering/brake fluids inside the car?
[IMG:720:480]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/ ... p-0609.jpg[/img]

Looks like Honda abandoned the curved ears that were moulded in the cockpit for the Renault-esque ears
[IMG:720:480]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/ ... p-0646.jpg[/img]

Why are there tethers inside the wing?
[IMG:720:480]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/ ... p-0703.jpg[/img]

What are those things underneath the front suspensions looks really complex with the barge boards and turning vanes?
[IMG:720:480]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/ ... p-0760.jpg[/img]
Simon: Nils? You can close in now. Nils?
John McClane: [on the guard's phone] Attention! Attention! Nils is dead! I repeat, Nils is dead, ----head. So's his pal, and those four guys from the East German All-Stars, your boys at the bank? They're gonna be a little late.
Simon: [on the phone] John... in the back of the truck you're driving, there's $13 billon dollars worth in gold bullion. I wonder would a deal be out of the question?
John McClane: [on the phone] Yeah, I got a deal for you. Come out from that rock you're hiding under, and I'll drive this truck up your ass.

modbaraban
modbaraban
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 17:44
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Post

Is it just me or those chimneys are bigger now? Huge in fact :shock:

bizadfar
bizadfar
0
Joined: 03 Jan 2007, 15:51

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

kilcoo316 wrote:
ginsu wrote:Ferrari have probably the smallest gurney flaps I've ever seen, can't be more than 5mm. I think this is the first time they've appeared on the upper element. And a good picture of the device attached to the bottom, it's supposed to help clean up the airflow.

You talking about the vertical plate under the wing 1st element?


Its a wing fence, reduces spanwise flow and will increase downforce.



Interesting that they aren't running the wing as close to the ground as they can though isn't it. (obviously if they can stick that under it the wing could drop down)
regulations state how low they can go.

kilcoo316
kilcoo316
21
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 16:45
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

ginsu wrote: Yea, I've seen similar devices on airplane wings. And my understanding is that they prevent the flow from traveling perpendicular to the cord. This is what 'reducing spanwise flow' means, right?
Correct.

ginsu wrote: My question is, does this 'fence' really work for high speed conditions or low speed?

To clarify, I thought on airplanes the fences were used primarily for the transonic regime, not low speed. So, I'm a little surprised to see it on an F1 car. Although, those 'slot gap' separators on the rear wing are increasingly looking like fences too!
It works at all speeds, but yeah, it was originally used on the MiG-15 for control of the spanwise boundary layer flow. Since the MiG-15 was a transonic fighter the wings were swept back, this increased the spanwise flow, and the wing fence helped reduce it alot.

This meant the wing would stall at the centre first instead of the wingtip (which is undesireable).



Here it will act as an addition to the endplate, giving a marginal increase in downforce.

kilcoo316
kilcoo316
21
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 16:45
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

bizadfar wrote:regulations state how low they can go.
Yeap, but if they can run a vertical plate under it, they can go lower with the main element.

bazanaius
bazanaius
0
Joined: 08 Feb 2008, 17:16

Re: Monaco Aero

Post

sorry, I know this thread is probably dead, but I found it by accident and..

I think the reason they have the fence below the wing and don't just drop the wing is because here we are talking about an upper element of the wing. the lower wing probably is as close to the ground as regs allow, but the upper element will need to be spaced from the lower element. Hence there's space to put a fence in - helps condition the flow so might as well be used if there's space.