Rear wing idea (creative interpretation of technical regs.?)

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
modbaraban
modbaraban
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 17:44
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Rear wing idea (creative interpretation of technical regs.?)

Post

Inspired by this...
Image
...today's shot of F2007 rear wing.

In 2004 (IIRC) there was a rule that banned any rear wing solutions that have more than 2 horizontal planes. So such widely used wings (upper pic below) became history.
But is it legal according to the current regs. to use additional rear wing planes which are technically parts of the endplates (bmw.sauber front wing lower pic)?
Image

I hope my explanation is okay. :roll:

User avatar
megz
1
Joined: 14 Mar 2007, 09:57
Location: New Zealand

Post

So very quickly and vaguely something like this?

[IMG:364:143]http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m39/ ... dbaron.jpg[/img]

modbaraban
modbaraban
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 17:44
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Post

Image
Or like this, or any other variation that proves to be efficient yet staying (at least) within the grey area of tech regs.

PS: I'm not too good when it comes to drawing. (where's manchild when you need him :roll: )
Last edited by modbaraban on 05 Oct 2007, 20:28, edited 1 time in total.

zac510
zac510
22
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 12:58

Post

I think there is a maximum width(thickness) for the rear wing end plate but I'd have to check that.

modbaraban
modbaraban
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 17:44
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Post

:o :x :(

In fact it's not grey but rather black and white there, right?
FIA wrote:3.10.4 Any bodywork behind the rear wheel centre line which is
more than 600mm above the reference plane, and between 75mm
and 480mm from the car centre line, must lie in an area when
viewed from the side of the car that is situated between the rear
wheel centre line and a point 350mm behind it. When viewed from
the side of the car, no longitudinal cross section may have more than
two closed sections in this area
. Furthermore, the distance between
adjacent sections at any longitudinal plane must not exceed 15mm
at their closest position.
In order to ensure that the relationship between these two sections
cannot change whilst the car is in motion they must be bridged by
means of rigid impervious supports (including any adjustment
mechanism) arranged such that no part of the trailing edge of the
forward section may be more than 250mm laterally from a support.
These rigid supports must :
- fully enclose the two complete sections such that their inner profile
matches that of the two sections. Their outer profile must be offset
from the inner profile by between 8 and 30mm and may not
incorporate any radius smaller than 10mm (‘gurney’ type trim tabs
may however be fitted between the supports) ;
- not be recessed into the wing profiles ;
- be arranged so that any curvature occurs only in a horizontal
plane;
- be between 2 and 3mm thick ;
- be rigidly fixed to the two sections. Some form of adjustment
mechanism between the sections may be incorporated for the sole
purpose of allowing adjustment of the sections relative to one
another whilst the car is in the pits ;
- be constructed from a material with modulus greater than 50GPa.
These supports will be ignored when assessing whether the car is in
compliance with Articles 3.9.1, 3.9.2, 3.10.1 and 3.10.5.
I shouldn't have been so lazy and read the regs before posting this one. I hope that at least I created some sort of distraction from the spygate, safetycargate etc. topics. :roll:

zac510
zac510
22
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 12:58

Post

Ah well, we almost had a rear-wing-fence-shelf-gate there :)

PNSD
PNSD
3
Joined: 03 Apr 2006, 18:10

Post

What about putting some extra slot gaps in... ? kinda like BMW's front wing with the extra slot gap in the middle.

Saribro
Saribro
6
Joined: 28 Jul 2006, 00:34

Post

That still breaks the max 2 closed sections rule.

modbaraban
modbaraban
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 17:44
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Post

Saribro wrote:That still breaks the max 2 closed sections rule.
Does the F2007 (the pic in the 1st post) wing with 2 almost horizontal mini-planes* comply with that rule?

*yes I do realize they're not for downforce but physically very similar to this (just much shorter):
Image