I found this very interesting. I am thinking renult or maybe BMW. Its not Red bull as they have said theres is under there fuel tank. It cant be Williams as they have a fly wheel.Q. Are teams allowed to run with batteries in the nose cone area?
Max Mosley: As far as I know, yes. There are regulations about what part you can put in what part of the car. I understand that one of the manufacturers is making a special battery which goes where the ballast goes, but obviously it is not as heavy as tungsten. I think most of them are going to put the entire system inside the fuel tank.
However, if one of those batteries goes into thermal runaway you need to get it out of the car – but we have left it to the experts. The last thing someone like me should do is second guess them, but they must make sure it is safe – and that is what we have the Working Group for.
Done. Also included the VJM-02 as well.axle wrote:ESP, can you please update your first post?
Brawn - low fat nose
FW31 - more like the F60 now...
ThanksESPImperium wrote:Done. Also included the VJM-02 as well.axle wrote:ESP, can you please update your first post?
Brawn - low fat nose
FW31 - more like the F60 now...
You mean before the pit-stop? It appears it must be within 5 degrees of ambient temperature.Belatti wrote:does fuel needs to be preheated, by the way?
No, I meant before entering the combustion chamber. Usually it has more disadvantages than advantagestimbo wrote:You mean before the pit-stop? It appears it must be within 5 degrees of ambient temperature.Belatti wrote:does fuel needs to be preheated, by the way?
Are they talking to the right Max Mosley? I thought all he did was second guess in the name of safety? Isn't that his excuse to hack up the rules every few years?However, if one of those batteries goes into thermal runaway you need to get it out of the car – but we have left it to the experts. The last thing someone like me should do is second guess them, but they must make sure it is safe – and that is what we have the Working Group for.
