Oh great. Now we're gonna get Nazi-Allies fanboy yingyang?xpensive wrote:The technical level between Germany and the UK in them days were different solar systems. While the brits were shipping their pitiful armored vehicles en masse, one Wehrmacht Panter could easily take out three of those before lunch.
And if you would dare to confront the Waffen-SS with their Tigers, running low on fuel as they did, get outta there.
How do you manage to get things so wrong.xpensive wrote:The technical level between Germany and the UK in them days were different solar systems. While the brits were shipping their pitiful armored vehicles en masse, one Wehrmacht Panter could easily take out three of those before lunch.
And if you would dare to confront the Waffen-SS with their Tigers, running low on fuel as they did, get outta there.
Maus was a joke.xpensive wrote:Then there was the "Maus" of course, but that's a different story alltogether.
That's freaking hilariousmanchild wrote:Maus was a joke.xpensive wrote:Then there was the "Maus" of course, but that's a different story alltogether.
Got to brag a bit, since I'm probably the only person on this forum (and globally) who had accidentally pressed trigger-button on tank, while it was parked in the garage, and fortunately only machine gun was loaded and ready to fire.
BTW, I was in the infantry and totally illegally messed with the tank.
Treading on tender feet here are we now? Cannot take away the engineering feat of the german industrie, though the failed hopelesly on the concept of stategic bombing.WhiteBlue wrote:This WWII tank talk is definitely OT here. Why don't you open an OT thread about it if your fascination compels you to discuss the technology? Some people don't like to be exposed to war machinery.
Reminds me of that war time RAF song about the B17.xpensive wrote:Treading on tender feet here are we now? Cannot take away the engineering feat of the german industrie, though the failed hopelesly on the concept of stategic bombing.WhiteBlue wrote:This WWII tank talk is definitely OT here. Why don't you open an OT thread about it if your fascination compels you to discuss the technology? Some people don't like to be exposed to war machinery.
The fuhrer had little understanding of this, while Goring was stoned out his mind, but the Heinkel engineers were not.
They actuallyy built, and flew, from Bretagne to NYC, and back. Not dropping bombs or anything, just for show.
The legend of Michael Wittmann, sitting on the hill near Bocars vilage early that morning, seing a long line of allied armouroed vehicles tru his binoculars, saying to the driver of that fat Tiger of his;autogyro wrote: Reminds me of that war time RAF song about the B17.
We are flying flying fortresses at 40,000 feet and we only have a tiny little bomb.
The Heinkel would fit that description well if it flew to New York and back.
It did not bomb anything because the aircraft was full of fuel.
Unlike the Mosquito which could bomb Berlin and carry the same load as a Lancaster and fly as fast as the current German fighters.
Touche I think.
Sorry, I think we should return to WBs pedal car.