Metric vs Imperial units

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
segedunum
segedunum
0
Joined: 03 Apr 2007, 13:49

Metric vs Imperial units

Post

xpensive wrote:Intersting measurement that, 760.643 mm, but with a +/- 2 mm tolerance...anyone of my designers putting that on a drawing would be fired on the spot!
It's a rather interesting disconnect in precision............ I had no idea things were quite that bad.
Last edited by mx_tifoso on 18 Aug 2010, 03:52, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Split from Flexible wing thread

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

But it is seg - take a look at that table defining the front wing center-section's profile - to the micron!
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

xpensive wrote:But it is seg - take a look at that table defining the front wing center-section's profile - to the micron!
+/-2mil.. :lol: :lol: :lol:

thats what happens when UK boffins can only think in inches and the whole --- is translated to french and metrics ...not the first time not the last to see a machinist cry unable to do his work..and wasting days....

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

I don't know marcush, I simply cannot believe that any F1 engineer in the UK would work with anything but metrics,
but Ross Brawn on the other hand...? :lol:
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

Bah. I'll take feet and inches any day. We should switch everything to base 12.

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

Right, most folks with six fingers on each hand would probably agree.
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
mep
29
Joined: 11 Oct 2003, 15:48
Location: Germany

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

Maybe this explains why french people can only count to sixty and then start to calculate.

60 soixante
70 soixante-dix (60+10)
80 quatre-vingt (4*20)
90 quatre-vingt-dix (4*20+10)

autogyro
autogyro
53
Joined: 04 Oct 2009, 15:03

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

mep wrote:Maybe this explains why french people can only count to sixty and then start to calculate.

60 soixante
70 soixante-dix (60+10)
80 quatre-vingt (4*20)
90 quatre-vingt-dix (4*20+10)
The French thing goes back to the establishment of the prime meridian at Greenwich.
Have you ever tried navigating in metric?

User avatar
mep
29
Joined: 11 Oct 2003, 15:48
Location: Germany

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

The French thing goes back to the establishment of the prime meridian at Greenwich.
Have you ever tried navigating in metric?
They could have used a system based on 10 for the time also.
Would make some things easier.
Its no problem to navigate then with it.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

Pup wrote:We should switch everything to base 12.
What is the rational behind such an alien proposal? Do you have six fingers on your hand?

High cultures like the Romans have been using decimals for over 2,000 years and the positional decimal Hindu-Arabic system - which we use - is now more than 1,200 years old. More than half the earth population is using a decimal system. Further the international SI unit system which was created by modern scientists and engineers is based on the positional decimal system. To make changes to that sounds like a very strange idea.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

marcush. wrote:
xpensive wrote:But it is seg - take a look at that table defining the front wing center-section's profile - to the micron!
+/-2mil.. :lol: :lol: :lol:

thats what happens when UK boffins can only think in inches and the whole --- is translated to french and metrics ...not the first time not the last to see a machinist cry unable to do his work..and wasting days....
I think you'll find that the UK is metric in all but name so far as engineering is concerned.

The only areas that are still imperial are road use (miles and miles per hour - fuel is already sold in litres) and beer.

Some older types still use feet/inches and pounds/ounces.

The rest is just about always metric - which is only right. Imperial is a dog's breakfast of a system.

And the funniest thing is that much of it was based on "English" units that were introduced by the Normans or were reused Roman systems. Some Anglo-Saxon remainded but that was often linked to the Roman systems.

All good fun...
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: Metric vs Imperial units

Post

Personally I'm a big fan of Imperial units.

1) They're easy.

2) When all your machine shop equipment and tooling is in Imperial units, that's what's practical.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.

RacingManiac
RacingManiac
9
Joined: 22 Nov 2004, 02:29

Re: Metric vs Imperial units

Post

Jersey Tom wrote:Personally I'm a big fan of Imperial units.

1) They're easy.

2) When all your machine shop equipment and tooling is in Imperial units, that's what's practical.
Ditto, but now I have to use metric becuase I work in the automotive supplier chain now....

Its weird, I learn metric as a kid in Taiwan, used metric throughout schools in Canada(still remember the dread that when the prof says there will be question in english unit). Yet I did all my FSAEs in imperial, uses AN/Mil-spec stuff in imperial, and learn all my machining in imperial. So now when I am designing stuff, I think in inches/psi because thats how I make things...Its hard to change back.

imightbewrong
imightbewrong
17
Joined: 07 Aug 2008, 16:18

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

autogyro wrote:
mep wrote:Maybe this explains why french people can only count to sixty and then start to calculate.

60 soixante
70 soixante-dix (60+10)
80 quatre-vingt (4*20)
90 quatre-vingt-dix (4*20+10)
The French thing goes back to the establishment of the prime meridian at Greenwich.
Have you ever tried navigating in metric?
What is your source on that if I may ask? Can find nothing on it here at least
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigesimal

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Metric vs Imperial units

Post

Wtf is this, metric vs imperial, as if it was some kinda beauty contest? Must be Tomba's idea of a practical joke! :lol:
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"