Let's not. A separate thread that can be killed as required would be better. Let's not pollute the race thread with religious/political discussion.WhiteBlue wrote:
Perhaps the mods can re open the thread and we can monitor the situation.
I don't think they have much chance to resolve the underlying issues in the short term. The majority of the population is of the Shia religious branch of muslim believe. They are disadvantaged in public life because the reigning monarchy is of Sunni believe. They feel threatened by the Iranian influence which is also shiite.gridwalker wrote:If these protests can lead to a better quality of life for the people then I don't really care if the race goes ahead ... unfortunately, that is a very big "if" indeed.
Indeed. So why worry about it now?WhiteBlue wrote:We cannot know.
There is a test scheduled in Bahrain on 03.03.2011 which is only 19 day away. So there is some obvious interest by F1 fans about public unrest which can disrupt the test and the GP.richard_leeds wrote:Indeed. So why worry about it now?WhiteBlue wrote:We cannot know.
My comment in the context of F1techical. Obviously there is a valid discussion to be had over at Amnesty International or Human Right Watch, but not here.
I reckon they will try to have demonstrations under the eye of the GP visitors in places like the airport, tourist hotels and at the entry to the track. This would make it tricky for the riot police to use inappropriate violence without the international visitors realizing what goes on.http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/89491
Nabeel Rajab, vice president of campaign group Bahrain Center for Human Rights, said on Tuesday that the grand prix was being viewed as an opportunity for protesters to publicise their cause.
"For sure F1 is not going to be peaceful this time," Rajab told Arabian Business. "There'll be lots of journalists, a lot of people looking and [the government] will react in a stupid manner as they did today and yesterday. And that will be bloody, but will be more publicised."
An index of unrest in the Arab world
IN THIS week's print edition we ran a table showing a number of indicators for members of the Arab League. By adding a few more and ascribing different weights to them we have come up with the Shoe-thrower's index, which aims to predict where the scent of jasmine may spread next. Some factors are hard to put a number on and are therefore discounted. For instance, dissent is harder in countries with a very repressive secret police (like Libya). The data on unemployment were too spotty to be comparable and so this important factor is discounted too. We took out the Comoros and Djibouti, which do not have a great deal in common with the rest of the group, and removed the Palestinian territories, Sudan and Somalia for lack of data. The chart below is the result of ascribing a weighting of 35% for the share of the population that is under 25; 15% for the number of years the government has been in power; 15% for both corruption and lack of democracy as measured by existing indices; 10% for GDP per person; 5% for an index of censorship and 5% for the absolute number of people younger than 25. Jordan comes out surprisingly low on the chart, which suggests the weighting might need to be tweaked. Post suggestions in the comments below and we will refine it.