I don’t much like VER radio comms. It wasn’t needed and tells a story of his mindset after losing it all in the pitstops.
Still, he was there around the outside legitimately. High risk move sure but really he had v v little to lose at that point
Exactly, but no collision, despite them being both clearly wrong. People seem to be angry that it was a collision.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:06Like Max on the first lap you mean? Not a cars width there.politburo wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:05It's not about being ahead *facepalm*. Who in the world told you that if you're side by side and one driver is a meter or 2 ahead, with cars that are 5 meters long, then they can just turn in like the other driver isn't there?. There is so much precedence for this I don't understand what you're even arguing, its about being significantly alongside. Can point to at least 5+ situations like these in the past two years alone where a driver gets penalized for forcing another driver off-track/crowding because they did not leave a car's width.
It's a chicane and it's Hamilton's corner. Verstappen has to overtake and react to what Hamilton is doing. Why should Hamilton yield, he was probably expecting Verstappen to back out but he "SEND IT!"politburo wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:05It's not about being ahead *facepalm*. Who in the world told you that if you're side by side and one driver is a meter or 2 ahead, with cars that are 5 meters long, then they can just turn in like the other driver isn't there?. There is so much precedence for this I don't understand what you're even arguing, its about being significantly alongside. Can point to at least 5+ situations like these in the past two years alone where a driver gets penalized for forcing another driver off-track/crowding because they did not leave a car's width.Spacepace wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 15:57Yeah he was never ahead and was only alongside when Hamilton was turning and he was lifted off the road by the giant sausage kerb. Verstappen should have backed out but he knew if hadn't stayed alongside Hamilton would have stayed aheadEl Scorchio wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 15:51
No they weren't. At no point during the corner was Verstappen ahead until he was airborne.
Hamilton has a right to the apex of turn 2. He doesn't need to open the doorRyar wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:08You have to leave a car's width, no matter where you are. Simple rule, which Lewis didn't follow.dans79 wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:06There's a difference between the inside of the corner and the outside and the entry to the corner and the exit of a corner.astracrazy wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:01Shame some people on this board can't stay consistent. Max's fault this time because his nose wasn't in front, yet Silverstone it was Max's fault because he should have just left room, even though Lewis didn't have his nose in front.
Show me the photo where Verstappen was ahead hahaRyar wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:06Lewis had colder tyres compared to Max and Max was clearly, ahead. So that's a bad move again from Lewis.NathanOlder wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:05Not ahead, so Lewis has the right to the line. Like Max did on lap 1.politburo wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 15:57
You have seen Lewis onboard I presume?. If you haven't then you'd rather not claim this. This is on initial turn in. Verstappen is literally right there.
https://i.imgur.com/p1jyloI.png
That's not how it works. They only say leave a car's width, so cars don't go off track. They don't instruct anyone to yield, that at the end of the day is your own opinion who should yield. But all this nonsense about who is ahead gets the corner is just senseless, if you are ahead still side by side you must leave the space, and sadly, one driver didn't and the collided rear tyres which DNF'd both. It's really that simple.Spacepace wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:08It's a chicane and it's Hamilton's corner. Verstappen has to overtake and react to what Hamilton is doing. Why should Hamilton yield, he was probably expecting Verstappen to back out but he "SEND IT!"politburo wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:05It's not about being ahead *facepalm*. Who in the world told you that if you're side by side and one driver is a meter or 2 ahead, with cars that are 5 meters long, then they can just turn in like the other driver isn't there?. There is so much precedence for this I don't understand what you're even arguing, its about being significantly alongside. Can point to at least 5+ situations like these in the past two years alone where a driver gets penalized for forcing another driver off-track/crowding because they did not leave a car's width.
There are no rights if there is a car alongside. Austria clearly established it.
Max knew race was lost after the pit stop. Couldn't get a mclaren and would be behind them and Ham on the better tyre - 'if I'm not winning you ain't either'
lol
Well you dont understand how chicanes work.Ryar wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:08You have to leave a car's width, no matter where you are. Simple rule, which Lewis didn't follow.dans79 wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:06There's a difference between the inside of the corner and the outside and the entry to the corner and the exit of a corner.astracrazy wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:01Shame some people on this board can't stay consistent. Max's fault this time because his nose wasn't in front, yet Silverstone it was Max's fault because he should have just left room, even though Lewis didn't have his nose in front.
And that's a really dangerous attitude to have. It's basically what led Schumacher to hit Hill and Villeneuve all those years ago. As mentioned 'If I'm not coming out of this corner ahead then neither of us is coming out of it.'101FlyingDutchman wrote: ↑12 Sep 2021, 16:08I don’t much like VER radio comms. It wasn’t needed and tells a story of his mindset after losing it all in the pitstops.
Still, he was there around the outside legitimately. High risk move sure but really he had v v little to lose at that point
Yep to a large degree probably true!