El Scorchio wrote: ↑21 Nov 2021, 17:26
oT v1 wrote: ↑21 Nov 2021, 17:25
Hmm he’s been there for 2 laps why now?
They realised they couldn’t move it?
Why not just leave it there? Seems nonsensical from my armchair, how they always these days remove a car no matter what the situation is. Is it legal liability for not being as 'safe' as possible? (as if a F1 car is a worse thing to hit than a wall)
edit: Every safety decision is weighing pros and cons. The improved safety from doing this is so miniscule if not zero, it seems to not warrant disrupting the race for it. If we follow this decision as a philosophy, we have to ask if we should do other extreme measures to disrupt the race to improve safety by any means necessary. Why have a 57 lap grand prix for example... why not make it 20 laps? That would be much safer.