3/4 of reporters and pundits would be out of work though and all the talking points will have been covered fully by like Tuesday after a race
Pundits have the best gig. They just say whatever and get paid for it, fact or not.
3/4 of reporters and pundits would be out of work though and all the talking points will have been covered fully by like Tuesday after a race
It's a pretty simple and effective device, the only issue is how would they simulate grip via downforce?
Interesting isn't it. Perhaps the teams can extrapolate what it'll be like from comparing previous real world results vs whatever metrics and data this machine gives and has historically given out?
If I was to guess that's exactly what they would do. Although by that point it's pretty late in the day anyway so FP1 might be the place they build their data from.El Scorchio wrote: ↑24 Nov 2021, 19:53Interesting isn't it. Perhaps the teams can extrapolate what it'll be like from comparing previous real world results vs whatever metrics and data this machine gives and has historically given out?
scarabs responded a few times to the tweet, and mentioned this in one of his responses! To me thats means they would have to be using a laser, but then sand, grit or any other foreign matter would affect the reading.SiLo wrote: ↑24 Nov 2021, 20:00If I was to guess that's exactly what they would do. Although by that point it's pretty late in the day anyway so FP1 might be the place they build their data from.El Scorchio wrote: ↑24 Nov 2021, 19:53Interesting isn't it. Perhaps the teams can extrapolate what it'll be like from comparing previous real world results vs whatever metrics and data this machine gives and has historically given out?
I read the page briefly ,and I'm still not sure how that's calculating the coefficient of friction!pb6797 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2021, 23:22I suspect it's a manually propelled version of one of these: https://www.airport-suppliers.com/suppl ... ab-sarsys/