LM10 wrote: ↑22 Dec 2021, 23:08
Dee wrote: ↑22 Dec 2021, 22:45
No 1 factor is the engine imo as the aero is so tightly regulated
No matter how tight the regulations are, the engineers are so amazingly clever that they will still manage to come up with various concepts. We’re talking about tenths after all. There is no way we’re going to see such a tight field in the first year as we’ve seen last season.
There is a good probability that the field would be bunched, relatively more than any previous regulations change. The reason why I say that is, FIA (Brawn & Co.) are hell bent on making this an equal opportunity for everyone and are ready to shoot down any advantage that any team is trying to gain. They created a team of engineers of their own to find grey areas, so that they can be clamped down, which wasn't the case in previous regulations. Above all, they are willing use "spirit of the rules" as a reason to simply knock down any circumvention/exploitation of the grey areas, which Pat Symonds claimed they have already done for many queries that came from teams. There have been many TDs they have been issuing in that regard. There will still be some teams that have far better understanding of efficiently building mechanical platforms that can provide an edge. But that's about general efficiency, not finding edge from rules. The engine however, is going to be a distinguishing factor. If Ferrari and Renault haven't done a good job of bringing their PUs on par with Mercedes and Honda, then that would be a major problem, considering homologation rules.
If Pirelli comes up with another version of their black art and never ending new compounds, that would pose challenge for teams that haven't managed it well in the last many years. I wish there would be a way to go back to Bridgestone era where tyres were almost never a consideration in performance differentiation. Personally, it was hillarious to see hard compounds being the faster compound in Saudi and on a few other occasions.