Macklaren wrote: ↑11 Feb 2022, 23:21
I'm sure its going to be scrutinized to minutiae by people much smarter than me
Your wish is my command
Front to back:
Noticeable dip in the front wing mid section and gap under the nose, looks similar to the launch Aston but the shakedown pictures of the Aston show no gap between the nose and wing and a wide gap under the front wing similar to an Indycar. Likely to allow more airflow to the under body. But Mclaren seem to have a wide gap between the nose tip and lower wing element, likely to generate more front downforce. Reminds me of the 2008 BMW Sauber front wing (where Andreas Seidl was working at the time).
Aston front wing at Silverstone for comparison
Vortex generator on the mid of the upper wing main-plane likely to control airflow around the suspension elements
McLarens front wing has slats at the bottom of the end plate vs the solid piece on the Aston. Aston is running a traditional semi-circular curved down slat on the bottom of the front wing endplate (at launch), while McLaren is using the tips of the front wing as vortex generators. That's interesting. Looks like the Aston has this as well on the shakedown spec
Noticeably large straight cut out of the barge board
Sidepod air intakes look tiny, Haas ran similar tiny intakes on their car at launch. Aston is running a square intake, mclarens is much wider and rectangular.
No vertical pillar on the mirror to the chassis, unlike the HAAS or Aston. Mclarens mirror mount far more sculpted.
Aston's side pods are huge compared to the coke bottle on the Mclaren and Haas. Aston have tons of ventilation on top of the chassis though, so they might be trying something. Possibly trying to use the hot air on the surface of the body to do something? While Mclaren are using the traditional approach of streamlining the packaging around the engine.
Flat area with no vortex generators on the rear floor. This area is worth paying attention too because it can be used to control the rear tire wake.