well, I wish was that simple. They may have tested it in the WT and CFD. This is one thingm but actually re-designing the cars, GB, etc, is another thing and this take lots time and resources.axle wrote: And further more, with all the teams ready to deploy/highly developed their own versions the money has been spent...so why not go the whole hog and use them!
I would not put it in these words. They obviously tried to be very clever and arrogant, but got caught lying multiple times. I would expect them to be banned a few races. Depends on how much the team was involved. It is becoming more and more clear that at least MW was in the loop, and possibly everyone in the pit-wall.axle wrote: No I only hope that McLaren don't get booted out of the WCC/WDC for being stupid as that too would ruin a good season.
Roll on China.
Whatever...vall wrote:well, I wish was that simple. They may have tested it in the WT and CFD. This is one thingm but actually re-designing the cars, GB, etc, is another thing and this take lots time and resources.axle wrote: And further more, with all the teams ready to deploy/highly developed their own versions the money has been spent...so why not go the whole hog and use them!
I would not put it in these words. They obviously tried to be very clever and arrogant, but got caught lying multiple times. I would expect them to be banned a few races. Depends on how much the team was involved. It is becoming more and more clear that at least MW was in the loop, and possibly everyone in the pit-wall.axle wrote: No I only hope that McLaren don't get booted out of the WCC/WDC for being stupid as that too would ruin a good season.
Roll on China.
Otherwise, enjoy the w grade F1 this season. Amazingly, MrM idea for 2 level F1 came to being earlier than planned
=D>DaveKillens wrote:In NASCAR, if a team(s) introduced something radical or innovative, they would get an immediate ruling on the matter. No waiting weeks and months for a resolution. I approve such a process, because delays of this nature has a negative impact on the fans.
DaveKillens wrote:Finally, a conclusion to this double deck diffuser controversy. Personally, I fail to see why this has commanded so much attention. It's really just two different interpretations of one rule that was clarified. Of course, teams on each side did their politicking, and fans supporting their respective teams made a lot of noise.
It's unfortunate that no matter which way the decision went, someone was going to spend a lot of money. The responsibility for that I place on the FIA, for deliberately writing vague rules. But this kind of stuff goes on in a very regular basis, and will continue to happen.
The process is broken. In NASCAR, if a team(s) introduced something radical or innovative, they would get an immediate ruling on the matter. No waiting weeks and months for a resolution. I approve such a process, because delays of this nature has a negative impact on the fans.
No, the two technologies have nothing in common.cultavix wrote:arent the teams WITHOUT difussors basically the ones with KERS??????