If I had a penny every time I heard this, I would have no budget cap issues.
Did that update bring a bigger DRS flap though? I cant remember. Was Sainz running the new spec wing in Canada, as the RB had the edge on that straight even with no DRS vs Ferrari with DRS
No they didn't have an edge in canada, passing in canada was very hard with these cars, there were 36 overtakes in canada and Leclerc was almost half of them, and no Sainz wasn't running the new rear wing anyway, but it's irrelevant, that's not why he couldn't pass Max, just like Max couldn't pass LEC in Baku.chrisc90 wrote: ↑18 Jul 2022, 18:56Did that update bring a bigger DRS flap though? I cant remember. Was Sainz running the new spec wing in Canada, as the RB had the edge on that straight even with no DRS vs Ferrari with DRS
The claim that Ferrari with DRS was slower than RBR without DRS sounds so unrealistic that I don’t even need to check it to comfortably tell that this is not true.chrisc90 wrote: ↑18 Jul 2022, 18:56Did that update bring a bigger DRS flap though? I cant remember. Was Sainz running the new spec wing in Canada, as the RB had the edge on that straight even with no DRS vs Ferrari with DRS
Oh wow, I misread the original comment, that is some wild stuff .LM10 wrote: ↑18 Jul 2022, 19:16The claim that Ferrari with DRS was slower than RBR without DRS sounds so unrealistic that I don’t even need to check it to comfortably tell that this is not true.
RB didn't get to see their potential because of poor setup. Tyre deg remember?
So... tyre deg was why they weren't faster on the straight in neither quali or the race?
I don't think it's even remotely black and white as some people wanna make it. RB were clearly slower in Monaco but faster in the slow speed at Silverstone and Miami. In Baku they were losing through the castle section in QP but gaining massively every lap in the race. Ferrari were struggling a bit in the medium speed in Austria while they were great through those corners in Spain. It's very much setup-dependant how the two cars (three if you count Merc in for France) perform against one another. Difficult to make predictions before the cars hit the track.
I shouldn't have to explain that to you. If a car doesn't have as much traction and has to brake earlier..
Is the new narrative
Austria is front limited, the fronts wore faster than the rears. In fact the rear tires this year are very strong and to make the fronts last requires a more rear biased driving style. You have to be a little more aggressive with the rears to make them wear at the same rate as the fronts, but that technique invites more mistakes. If you just rely on the fronts and try to save the rears you'll end up with understeer as the fronts wear faster than the rears.deadhead wrote: ↑18 Jul 2022, 21:38Is the new narrative
RBR wins front limited tracks
Ferrari wins rear limited tracks
?
I didn't refer to the runoff area or any of the track safety features. Just delete all curbs and let the other side of the white line be grass or gravel. Track safety can be adjusted to these. Better than car-launching sausage curbs and endless tarmac runoffs.GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑18 Jul 2022, 14:56That looks Like multiple disasters waiting to happen at F1 cornering speeds though.kalinka wrote: ↑18 Jul 2022, 07:50Just get back to basics (Mid-Ohio, Indy car ) :
https://cdn-1.motorsport.com/images/amp ... exande.jpg
I don't think any track-limit policing is required here.
Reportedly, rb18 was 10 kg heavier than minimum weight in Austria while Ferrari is now on the mark.ringo wrote: ↑18 Jul 2022, 19:42RB didn't get to see their potential because of poor setup. Tyre deg remember?
Agreed; I think anybody backing Ferrari would be hoping 2 cars finish the race... at least that is somewhat guaranteed a solid result if that is the case!