An inconsistent team that throws away the championship not even halfway through the season while having arguably the best car on the grid is, by definition, terrible.
An inconsistent team that throws away the championship not even halfway through the season while having arguably the best car on the grid is, by definition, terrible.
Best car, i don't know. For sure, it was a car capable of competing in pretty much every track even though, on average, the performance between RB and Ferrari was very close (outside some outliers like Imola, Austria, Melbourne and SPA).
I really don't think what we saw is anything to do with TD039. Ferrari still had their gap to the midfield. Performance ebbs and flows and Ferrari performed on the low end of this ebb and flow while RB aced it.
If they run high and crucially stiff again this weekend then one can begin to doubt binotto's denials that td 039 has affected their performanceAR3-GP wrote: ↑01 Sep 2022, 22:03I really don't think what we saw is anything to do with TD039. Ferrari still had their gap to the midfield. Performance ebbs and flows and Ferrari performed on the low end of this ebb and flow while RB aced it.
Zandvoort will be illuminating in this regard as it's expected to be a Ferrari circuit much to the disappointment of the Dutch crowd.
I wouldn't bet my life on it. Since much of the talk was also about RB working better with an increased ride height.Andi76 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022, 19:53Most engineers say the bouncing restrictions have almost no effect on the performance of the cars. And as Spa requires high ride heights anyway, because of the compression in Eau Rouge, the kerbs in 14 and the bumps in 15, i do not think the bouncing restrictions were the reason for RBs domination. I honestly think its like Max said - Spa is the perfect track for the RB18. What also suggests that is that RB was exceptionally fast. Its not like the others were exceptionally slow. And its also highly unlikely that the bouncing restrictions hurt every other team the same, what it would have had, as the pecking order was basically the same behind the Red Bulls. So - the only explaination that makes sense, in my opinion, is indeed that Spa just was the perfect track for Red Bull. But the next race in Zandvort will tell.
So inconsistent to be extremely horrible. I was modest with my criticism towards them but after this first half of the year, they deserve all the ridicule they got, and then some. At this point I would sooner expect their brake thought to suck in tear-offs and other trash far more easily than the rest (because of stupid design) than just mere bad luck for Leclerc. It seems like there's nothing they can't do stupidly.
Spa had nothing to do with TD039 for two reasons and because of that its highly unlikely that Ferrari gets hurt by TD039
Agree with this, it doesn´t matter what team gets hurt, if drivers safety is compromised FIA must prevent extreme porposing. Wich team is affected or wich team isn´t is irrelevant, safety first
When did we have extreme porpoising for the last time? I did not hear any driver (not even Mercedes) complain since Barcelona. Teams were able to sort it out by themselves. So this TD was unnecessary and exaggerated. Anyway - its a shame that teams who were able to design a car working properly now could get punished because there was/were team(s)not able to design a car working properly. Thats a very bad precedent and a bad evolution. If you got your design wrong and cannot be competitive and do not want to sacrifice even more performance - complain about safety instead of making your homework and get your car working properly.Andres125sx wrote: ↑02 Sep 2022, 08:06Agree with this, it doesn´t matter what team gets hurt, if drivers safety is compromised FIA must prevent extreme porposing. Wich team is affected or wich team isn´t is irrelevant, safety first