DChemTech wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 11:30
MadMax wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 11:22
fourmula1 wrote: ↑31 Oct 2022, 03:55
Thinking RB is sandbagging and doing a better job hiding it than Merc did. They are performing nearly flawlessly aside from some recent pit errors. They have not been truly pushed since the first few races. I bet Max had tons of time in hand. Onto next season. Will we eventually see more parity with the tiered wind tunnel time plus the cost cap penalty? This is just boring.
Max's lap times were so consistent that it was obvious he was driving just fast enough to control Hamilton. The car had pace to spare. It's a shame for Sergio that the car has been developed in line with Max's preferences, but that's the problem you face when you are Rubens to Max's Michael.
Doesn't mean they're sandbagging. They had a choice:
A) control pace and tyre deg to make a 1-stop on S/M work out.
B) running a higher pace to increase the gap over Ham, but taking an extra stop.
If the car had pace to spare, that doesn't mean they were artificially keeping the gap small - it was perhaps a matter of strategic requirement, and using the extra pace may in the end have reduced the gap if they required an extra stop.
Perez pushed harder in the beginning and still made it on his set of tyres without issues, so there most likely was a bit of a margin for Verstappen as well, but yeah, I wouldn't call it sandbagging either. They just made sure to be able to make it home without another stop.
It would have been interesting to see how close Russell would have come on softs, or if he could have pushed him into another stop at least - but unfortunately Mercedes was way too conservative. They should have splitted strategies at the start already, and at the very latest when it became obvious that there wasn't much degradation anyway, and Ferrari no threat at all.