What are these? Paddle shifters and...?
I don't have a clue, but the clutch is also activated with paddles behind the wheel. On the other hand, the McLaren KERS button is *not* on the wheel, so it could be that Ferrari engineers have found that a KERS-dedicated paddle is the best option.bhallg2k wrote:What are these? Paddle shifters and...?
I found something From Wiki..timbo wrote:Because you aim at IR range every layer should be sufficiently thick, and multilayer coating might become somewhat cumbersome. But I don't see why same general principle shouldn't work.Miguel wrote:I suppose one could arrange then a multilayer coating similar to high quality mirrors and lenses in order to further improve heat reflectivity. Or am I pushing things a tad too far?
gold is quite "plastic" material. I mean you can create really thin layer of it (weight) w/out using sophisticated technologies.n smikle wrote:(...) I think the Gold might have other properties that make it desirable. (...)
Did you bother reading the comparison? It's the most suitable for the task: Doesn't corrode, easiest to form, higher melting-point than silver, and reflects well.ISLAMATRON wrote:Why because it is expensive?
Corrode? over the course of a GP? not important... easier to form? when do F1 teams care about easy to form? They subcontract that crap out anyway. Ok higher melting point, but if the back of the drivers seat approaches 1000 degrees C then they have bigger problems than heat shielding.Metar wrote:Did you bother reading the comparison? It's the most suitable for the task: Doesn't corrode, easiest to form, higher melting-point than silver, and reflects well.ISLAMATRON wrote:Why because it is expensive?
n smikle wrote:I found something From Wiki..timbo wrote:Because you aim at IR range every layer should be sufficiently thick, and multilayer coating might become somewhat cumbersome. But I don't see why same general principle shouldn't work.Miguel wrote:I suppose one could arrange then a multilayer coating similar to high quality mirrors and lenses in order to further improve heat reflectivity. Or am I pushing things a tad too far?
Infrared radiation is about 0.7 micrometers to 100 micrometers.. so it's very close between, Al, silver and gold. I think the Gold might have other properties that make it desirable. Maybe more malleable, or maybe because it does not tarnish so easily at high temperatures (?)
Looks like the gold and silver have the greatest AUC in the infrared rangeISLAMATRON wrote:Metar wrote:ISLAMATRON wrote:Why because it is expensive?
If you look at the graph it is clear that the bare Al has the most area under the curve, and it is clearly the least dense.
ISLAMATRON wrote:Corrode? over the course of a GP? not important... easier to form? when do F1 teams care about easy to form? They subcontract that crap out anyway. Ok higher melting point, but if the back of the drivers seat approaches 1000 degrees C then they have bigger problems than heat shielding.Metar wrote:Did you bother reading the comparison? It's the most suitable for the task: Doesn't corrode, easiest to form, higher melting-point than silver, and reflects well.ISLAMATRON wrote:Why because it is expensive?
If you look at the graph it is clear that the bare Al has the most area under the curve, and it is clearly the least dense.
Clearly there must be other reasons why the F1 teams use gold.
No.jamsbong wrote:Just wondering, did Schumacher test the F60?