2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
taperoo2k
taperoo2k
14
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 17:33

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
10 Jun 2023, 13:37
I dont believe it is scaling doesn't make sense to be scaling. You have say a hundred peice model, if one part is not scaled properly, the model simply wont come together. If you are taking about scaling of measurements then this would be revealed with some sort of calibration done before testing.

A tolerance problem is what I believe was happening...
If the scaling/tolerances were off even by a tiny amount it would cause a host of problems including wind tunnel data. Don't forget Mercedes had job adverts for modelling roles and so on a while back. With a team as a big as Mercedes it might take a while for the mistake to be noticed. We'll probably never know for certain, because it would be embarrassing for Mercedes to admit they made such a schoolboy error.

I'd expect Mercedes to get closer to Red Bull over the season, but nothing that sees Max pushing the RB19 to it's ultimate pace/limits. He's pretty much cruising this season. We'll see if the noises Mercedes are making about the car going back performance wise in Canada is true or the usual Mercedes underplaying it's chances.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

taperoo2k wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 13:47
PlatinumZealot wrote:
10 Jun 2023, 13:37
I dont believe it is scaling doesn't make sense to be scaling. You have say a hundred peice model, if one part is not scaled properly, the model simply wont come together. If you are taking about scaling of measurements then this would be revealed with some sort of calibration done before testing.

A tolerance problem is what I believe was happening...
If the scaling/tolerances were off even by a tiny amount it would cause a host of problems including wind tunnel data. Don't forget Mercedes had job adverts for modelling roles and so on a while back. With a team as a big as Mercedes it might take a while for the mistake to be noticed. We'll probably never know for certain, because it would be embarrassing for Mercedes to admit they made such a schoolboy error.

I'd expect Mercedes to get closer to Red Bull over the season, but nothing that sees Max pushing the RB19 to it's ultimate pace/limits. He's pretty much cruising this season. We'll see if the noises Mercedes are making about the car going back performance wise in Canada is true or the usual Mercedes underplaying it's chances.
Not saying it wont be problems. But I am ruling out scaling. You simply would fire even an undergraduate level engineering student if scaling was the issue. That's just outright incomoetence.

Rather go with tolerance or some sensor calibration or model calibration. Those are gremlins that can occur in a complex system. Scaling is too easy to spot.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

Hammerfist
Hammerfist
0
Joined: 06 Apr 2017, 04:18

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 00:39
If they are within two tenths then it means the car is actually 4 to 5 tenths slower. That Max is only pushing as fast as he needs to go.
Imo they need to aim to beat rbr on pace by the end of the year. Rbr will probably stop bringing upgrades soon and their cost cap penalty should affect their performance on track at the end of the year. If Merc can’t catch them in these circumstances then you can already forget about 2024.

User avatar
ValeVida46
0
Joined: 23 Feb 2023, 13:36

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

Hammerfist wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 16:43
PlatinumZealot wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 00:39
If they are within two tenths then it means the car is actually 4 to 5 tenths slower. That Max is only pushing as fast as he needs to go.
Imo they need to aim to beat rbr on pace by the end of the year. Rbr will probably stop bringing upgrades soon and their cost cap penalty should affect their performance on track at the end of the year. If Merc can’t catch them in these circumstances then you can already forget about 2024.
If it happens great, but wholly unrealistic in my opinion. In season development is stifled for everyone under the Budget cap, and RB are 1 second up the road.
Even with Red Bull cost cap penalty, that does not stop them from bringing updates themselves. But the championship is already a foregone conclusion so their focus will be for next year to consolidate the gap.
Factor in the compromises Merc have to make with the chassis optimised for a different concept, and the limitations placed on progress relative to RB are apparent.

cplchanb
cplchanb
11
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 19:13

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

taperoo2k wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 13:47
PlatinumZealot wrote:
10 Jun 2023, 13:37
I dont believe it is scaling doesn't make sense to be scaling. You have say a hundred peice model, if one part is not scaled properly, the model simply wont come together. If you are taking about scaling of measurements then this would be revealed with some sort of calibration done before testing.

A tolerance problem is what I believe was happening...
If the scaling/tolerances were off even by a tiny amount it would cause a host of problems including wind tunnel data. Don't forget Mercedes had job adverts for modelling roles and so on a while back. With a team as a big as Mercedes it might take a while for the mistake to be noticed. We'll probably never know for certain, because it would be embarrassing for Mercedes to admit they made such a schoolboy error.

I'd expect Mercedes to get closer to Red Bull over the season, but nothing that sees Max pushing the RB19 to it's ultimate pace/limits. He's pretty much cruising this season. We'll see if the noises Mercedes are making about the car going back performance wise in Canada is true or the usual Mercedes underplaying it's chances.
didnt they fire a number of aero staff around the allison/elliot swap? iirc there were reports that the wind tunnel components were incorrectly made leading to these significant calibration errors in their design work

Hammerfist
Hammerfist
0
Joined: 06 Apr 2017, 04:18

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

ValeVida46 wrote:
12 Jun 2023, 08:52
Hammerfist wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 16:43
PlatinumZealot wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 00:39
If they are within two tenths then it means the car is actually 4 to 5 tenths slower. That Max is only pushing as fast as he needs to go.
Imo they need to aim to beat rbr on pace by the end of the year. Rbr will probably stop bringing upgrades soon and their cost cap penalty should affect their performance on track at the end of the year. If Merc can’t catch them in these circumstances then you can already forget about 2024.
If it happens great, but wholly unrealistic in my opinion. In season development is stifled for everyone under the Budget cap, and RB are 1 second up the road.
Even with Red Bull cost cap penalty, that does not stop them from bringing updates themselves. But the championship is already a foregone conclusion so their focus will be for next year to consolidate the gap.
Factor in the compromises Merc have to make with the chassis optimised for a different concept, and the limitations placed on progress relative to RB are apparent.
If you have a penalty that restricts your wind tunnel time whilst your leading the championship by a mile you’re not going to apply precious wind tunnel time to the concept that has already won. You allocate that time to next year. This is why I think Redbull in the second half will be vulnerable. Merc has no such concerns and whatever works on this years car will apply to next year. They cannot afford to stop developing this years car early. They are currently behind. If they’re ever gonna catch Redbull we will find out after the summer break. I don’t see how that’s so unrealistic.

mendis
mendis
19
Joined: 03 Jul 2022, 16:12

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

Hammerfist wrote:
13 Jun 2023, 03:16
ValeVida46 wrote:
12 Jun 2023, 08:52
Hammerfist wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 16:43


Imo they need to aim to beat rbr on pace by the end of the year. Rbr will probably stop bringing upgrades soon and their cost cap penalty should affect their performance on track at the end of the year. If Merc can’t catch them in these circumstances then you can already forget about 2024.
If it happens great, but wholly unrealistic in my opinion. In season development is stifled for everyone under the Budget cap, and RB are 1 second up the road.
Even with Red Bull cost cap penalty, that does not stop them from bringing updates themselves. But the championship is already a foregone conclusion so their focus will be for next year to consolidate the gap.
Factor in the compromises Merc have to make with the chassis optimised for a different concept, and the limitations placed on progress relative to RB are apparent.
If you have a penalty that restricts your wind tunnel time whilst your leading the championship by a mile you’re not going to apply precious wind tunnel time to the concept that has already won. You allocate that time to next year. This is why I think Redbull in the second half will be vulnerable. Merc has no such concerns and whatever works on this years car will apply to next year. They cannot afford to stop developing this years car early. They are currently behind. If they’re ever gonna catch Redbull we will find out after the summer break. I don’t see how that’s so unrealistic.
Doesn't that apply to every team, including Red Bull? Unless Red Bull has some innovative, externally visible changes that are easily copyable, they wouldn't bring it now. But anything under the hood or mechanical in nature would be beneficial to be introduced this year, tested on track and carried forward.

User avatar
ValeVida46
0
Joined: 23 Feb 2023, 13:36

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

Hammerfist wrote:
13 Jun 2023, 03:16

If you have a penalty that restricts your wind tunnel time whilst your leading the championship by a mile you’re not going to apply precious wind tunnel time to the concept that has already won. You allocate that time to next year. This is why I think Redbull in the second half will be vulnerable. Merc has no such concerns and whatever works on this years car will apply to next year. They cannot afford to stop developing this years car early. They are currently behind. If they’re ever gonna catch Redbull we will find out after the summer break. I don’t see how that’s so unrealistic.
Merc have more limitations than Red Bull as to what will work carrying updates forward. There are things they cannot change this year like the rear suspension/gearbox pick up points, the driver position relative the chassis etc.
Red Bull have clearly got a direction they are following whereas Mercedes have changed course and are still utilising a platform from the previous direction. This will have implications on what Mercedes can bring, what will work and if it's even worth spending restricted budgetary allowance for somethings they cannot carry forwards in 2024 for reasons I've outlined.

That's not to say they cannot bring updates or have a good chance of finishing second. But the idea of them closing the gap to Red Bull this year seems very fanciful to me.

User avatar
AMG.Tzan
44
Joined: 24 Jan 2013, 01:35
Location: Greece

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

Hammerfist wrote:
13 Jun 2023, 03:16
ValeVida46 wrote:
12 Jun 2023, 08:52
Hammerfist wrote:
11 Jun 2023, 16:43


Imo they need to aim to beat rbr on pace by the end of the year. Rbr will probably stop bringing upgrades soon and their cost cap penalty should affect their performance on track at the end of the year. If Merc can’t catch them in these circumstances then you can already forget about 2024.
If it happens great, but wholly unrealistic in my opinion. In season development is stifled for everyone under the Budget cap, and RB are 1 second up the road.
Even with Red Bull cost cap penalty, that does not stop them from bringing updates themselves. But the championship is already a foregone conclusion so their focus will be for next year to consolidate the gap.
Factor in the compromises Merc have to make with the chassis optimised for a different concept, and the limitations placed on progress relative to RB are apparent.
If you have a penalty that restricts your wind tunnel time whilst your leading the championship by a mile you’re not going to apply precious wind tunnel time to the concept that has already won. You allocate that time to next year. This is why I think Redbull in the second half will be vulnerable. Merc has no such concerns and whatever works on this years car will apply to next year. They cannot afford to stop developing this years car early. They are currently behind. If they’re ever gonna catch Redbull we will find out after the summer break. I don’t see how that’s so unrealistic.
They can’t catch Red Bull let’s be real!

And that’s got to do with them starting the season almost 1 second off! They can’t claw back so much performance with in season upgrades! We aren’t in 2009 where teams bolted on the double diffuser for the first time and their car went 0,5 seconds quicker instantly!

There isn’t a magic bullet Mercedes can bring to their car to make it 0,5-0,7 seconds quicker! After all their chassis and rear suspension are designed around the old concept, so any updates won’t bring as much performance as changing these two alone!

All I’m hoping for is that they’ve at least got a proper development direction for next year that gets them to within 0,1-0,3 of Red Bull, which will still be remarkable considering the amount of time Red Bull has spent on their own concept since 2022!

I hope for some Red Bull “bad luck” at least that will gave us a win or two! Maybe a Brazil one off like last year may be on the cards… :lol:
"The only rule is there are no rules" - Aristotle Onassis

User avatar
214270
18
Joined: 27 Apr 2019, 18:49

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

Anybody know exactly what D”Ambrosio is doing for the team? What precisely is his role?
Team ANTI-HYPE. Prove it, then I’ll anoint you.

maygun
maygun
3
Joined: 20 Mar 2023, 14:31

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

214270 wrote:
14 Jun 2023, 12:47
Anybody know exactly what D”Ambrosio is doing for the team? What precisely is his role?
https://www.crash.net/f1/news/1022656/1 ... e-mercedes

User avatar
214270
18
Joined: 27 Apr 2019, 18:49

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

maygun wrote:
14 Jun 2023, 15:00
214270 wrote:
14 Jun 2023, 12:47
Anybody know exactly what D”Ambrosio is doing for the team? What precisely is his role?
https://www.crash.net/f1/news/1022656/1 ... e-mercedes
That hardly needs him to be at races sat/stood next to Wolff on Sundays a la Lauda.
Team ANTI-HYPE. Prove it, then I’ll anoint you.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

214270 wrote:
14 Jun 2023, 23:56
maygun wrote:
14 Jun 2023, 15:00
214270 wrote:
14 Jun 2023, 12:47
Anybody know exactly what D”Ambrosio is doing for the team? What precisely is his role?
https://www.crash.net/f1/news/1022656/1 ... e-mercedes
That hardly needs him to be at races sat/stood next to Wolff on Sundays a la Lauda.
Presumably he and the team think he is doing something useful by being there. And it's their money, so...
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
Stu
Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2019, 10:05
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

Presumably within budget cap expenditure?
Perspective - Understanding that sometimes the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: 2023 Mercedes-AMG | Petronas F1 Team

Post

Stu wrote:
15 Jun 2023, 17:05
Presumably within budget cap expenditure?
If he 'knows stuff' it could well be a good price to pay :mrgreen:
To learn stuff you experiment, which could fail, or ask someone.
What stuff he knows that would be of use to the team though...
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.