If that wasn't the case, what was the need for Mercedes to move away from it?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 09:45Lots of people thinking that the sidepods are the sole reason for success, yes. Bizarre really.
If that wasn't the case, what was the need for Mercedes to move away from it?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 09:45Lots of people thinking that the sidepods are the sole reason for success, yes. Bizarre really.
As they said, they did it "just to make sure they didn't miss anything". If it was the golden bullet, they'd have just done a big-pod conversion and left everything else the same and suddenly been up there with the Bulls. But in reality, it's the suspension and the floor that's where the big performance is to be found. This issue wasn't with the sidepods, it was with controlling the floor's flow dynamics.mendis wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 11:35If that wasn't the case, what was the need for Mercedes to move away from it?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 09:45Lots of people thinking that the sidepods are the sole reason for success, yes. Bizarre really.
Personally I think that Elliot thought that the zeropod concept was the 99% solution. However that 99% was only able to be extracted 25% of the time. The current meta of cars is probably the 90% solution but can be extracted 90% of the time. The porpoising phenomenon probably threw a fatal wrench on the zeropod conceptFarnborough wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 13:11They're in face saving "strat" really, that's MB
They proved conclusively to themselves with all of their own monitoring tools, simulation etc, etc, that they couldn't get it to do what they thought they saw during design phase.
Ending with a chassis so compromised (again their view of it) that it cant be modified, needs new chassis/concept next year to fundamentally fix this. This in regard to driver position, ancillary package design etc, and all to be, ultimately, scrapped in 24 design. There's not a more dammed view that can be presented from this.
Admiral in his personal qualities, James Allison didn't throw Mike Elliot under the bus and apportion blame in that direction. I think it's a very, very good way to treat an employee at whichever level they are, there's a lot in ME but maybe not a cutting edge successful lead design of that car is one of them. An appreciation of any employee and utilisation of those attributes in the company, as in this period of MB, is the right way of going about running a cohesive and open company.
The remaining architecture of W14 is acknowledged as too compromised to achieve ongoing competitiveness (as a result of supporting that no-pod concept) such that it shows the original concept was a failure.
Equally, if the floor etc had not been hindered by that side pod design it wouldn't now be considered as being close to front of midfield pace. A simple shift away from zero and it appears to have come alive.
Ignoring the very obvious change to the front suspension geometry amongst other changes, eh?Farnborough wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 13:11A simple shift away from zero and it appears to have come alive.
Neutered track, ruined weekend thanks to the silly "short attention span" sprint race format imposed this weekend. Ah well.
Not at all, I understand and believe the contribution that makes.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 14:12Ignoring the very obvious change to the front suspension geometry amongst other changes, eh?Farnborough wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 13:11A simple shift away from zero and it appears to have come alive.
Would you also be one wearing Orange ? Blow some smoke.
It is a light orange raincoat actually! haha.