I just want to watch some f1 cars going around quick in undisturbed sessions is all.
Me neither.Juzh wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 13:54I just want to watch some f1 cars going around quick in undisturbed sessions is all.
As was said already I don't think Ver has a tangible advantage over Leclerc especially. It'll be very close, as in austria. Race might be a different story, but quali I wouldn't dismiss ferrari at all.
Welcome to the new world under climate change. I suspect we'll get more whacky weather over the next few yearsSieper wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 13:55Me neither.Juzh wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 13:54I just want to watch some f1 cars going around quick in undisturbed sessions is all.
As was said already I don't think Ver has a tangible advantage over Leclerc especially. It'll be very close, as in austria. Race might be a different story, but quali I wouldn't dismiss ferrari at all.
We just need hail or snow coming during a race. Probably would immediately be red flagged due to the helicopter not able to fly though??cplchanb wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 13:57Welcome to the new world under climate change. I suspect we'll get more whacky weather over the next few yearsSieper wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 13:55Me neither.Juzh wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 13:54
I just want to watch some f1 cars going around quick in undisturbed sessions is all.
As was said already I don't think Ver has a tangible advantage over Leclerc especially. It'll be very close, as in austria. Race might be a different story, but quali I wouldn't dismiss ferrari at all.
The camera position is dictated by the team isnt it? Otherwise we would have the same shot for each driver....and we dont.Juzh wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 14:12Leclerc's fp3 lap - behold FOM sinking to a new low with their onboard camera positioning. Worst camera angle I've seen maybe ever. Can't see anything. There's a car in front of him trough copse (that's why he's lifting and his entry speed is 310 kmh) but you couldn't tell from this shot. Horrendous..
No, it's sole discretion of the FOM and always has been.chrisc90 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 14:14The camera position is dictated by the team isnt it? Otherwise we would have the same shot for each driver....and we dont.Juzh wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 14:12Leclerc's fp3 lap - behold FOM sinking to a new low with their onboard camera positioning. Worst camera angle I've seen maybe ever. Can't see anything. There's a car in front of him trough copse (that's why he's lifting and his entry speed is 310 kmh) but you couldn't tell from this shot. Horrendous..
Guess they could have picked the upper camera rather than one of the side ones. There is only really 2 camera views you get facing forwards like you said. The upper one and the 'shoulder' cam (left or right)Juzh wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 14:16No, it's sole discretion of the FOM and always has been.chrisc90 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 14:14The camera position is dictated by the team isnt it? Otherwise we would have the same shot for each driver....and we dont.Juzh wrote: ↑08 Jul 2023, 14:12Leclerc's fp3 lap - behold FOM sinking to a new low with their onboard camera positioning. Worst camera angle I've seen maybe ever. Can't see anything. There's a car in front of him trough copse (that's why he's lifting and his entry speed is 310 kmh) but you couldn't tell from this shot. Horrendous..
There's also front wing cam and T-cam that's facing backwards.
I don't know who really desires to see such onboards or driver eye view that doesn't really give any feel. All that we need to see is what a driver is doing with the wheel and the front of the car positioning on track, preferably with a wide angle lens. What we are getting in this particular case is a cropped view that shows really nothing. Heck, just put an iPhone there!