If anyone is within 1 second off you, you lose a spot on the straight.
I'm quite surprised they are so bad.
Everyone was on high downforce setups on silverstone. Didn't make much of a difference with the others. Here, they have gone for high df package while everyone has gone for low df. The difference is astonishing though. It's crazy that it is this bad. Even with drs they are barely getting the speeds the others are getting without drs.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑30 Jul 2023, 15:20Note to self: don’t watch the race at Monza.
How was the car fast on the straights at silverstone?
They will have a low downforce configuration for Monza.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑30 Jul 2023, 15:20Note to self: don’t watch the race at Monza.
How was the car fast on the straights at silverstone?
They don't have parts for low downforce, they don't exist yet. They prioritised fixing the car with the recent upgrades. Plan is to now get one ready for Monza.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑30 Jul 2023, 15:29Did they go for this setup because they expected rain or because they didn’t have the parts for a low DF configuration? My guess is that it’s the first option because they weren’t as bad yesterday, but either way it’s just embarrassing.
It wasn't a decision. They don't have a low downforce package because they focused all their resources into getting the parts for the austrian upgrade package. All things considered, it was the right choice. We got 2 podiums because of it.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑30 Jul 2023, 15:29It was a huge mistake to get a high downforce set up gambling that it might rain. I have no idea who inside Mclaren thought they would get away with that.