LionsHeart wrote: ↑27 Aug 2023, 18:13
CjC wrote: ↑27 Aug 2023, 18:05
LionsHeart wrote: ↑27 Aug 2023, 18:00
I wrote in vain that with the expectation of rain, it’s not a fact that it will turn out. But even without rain, I generally came to the conclusion that the car was not the second fastest on the race track. Yes, there is a team error - Late called to the pits. But even without this, I did not see a high racing pace. So let it be for me personally the minimization of losses. It's still better, as both McLaren's cars were off the points for most of the race.
Don’t think we saw a high race pace because they were stuck behind drivers who’s team made the correct decision to fit intermediate tyres. Mclaren put themselves on the back foot almost immediately
Maybe you are right. Yes, it's quite possible. Perhaps in clean air McLaren would be faster. But the car still did not allow to sharply attack the opponents in front. Tsunoda resisted easily. And only on fresher tires Lando and Lewis managed to overtake Yuki.
The team should solve this problem by next year. In any case, I think Red Bull and Aston were faster. Where would Lando and Oscar have been had they been invited to the pit much sooner?
Alonso pitted for inters on lap 2, Norris was 1.2 behind. Norris then pitted on lap 3 when he comes out of the pits he’s lost 24.4 seconds to Alonso in one lap. One lap.
When they red flagged the race for Zhou Lando is 17.7 seconds behind Alonso, minus the 24.4 seconds lost for pitting late for inters puts him theoretically 6.7 seconds ahead of Alonso when the red flag falls.
I hope this sort of low tech analysis will happen at Mclaren as I’ve managed to do it with my IPad, F1 subscription, a TV and my Sky Sport subscription. Maybe the super computers are too smart and don’t factor common sense into the equations?