Theres nothing wrong with those kind of clothing or hairstyles. I'm sure they would say the same thing for todays hairstyles or clothing. Safe and exciting racing that I can agree.mwillems wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 20:06They also had Mullets for hairstyles, ridiculously tight short shorts and shirts that were made out of old peoples curtains. I don't want those days back. I prefer safe and exciting racing and not to just keep b*tching and finiding silly reasons when something goes against my team.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 18:22They used to race much harder than today and a mistake usually costed your life. You should never destroy someone elses race under any circumstance.
Because without a doubt if it happens to Norris you'll be saying how harsh the stewards are, what a ridiculous penalty, other people get away with it etc... Honestly it's the last I want to say about it, give it a rest for a change and take it on the chin instead of adding constant whining.
That's 2 times(that i can recall) that Lando is the car behind and is given the undercut.Seerix wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 19:45speaking of: https://www.racefans.net/2023/09/03/mcl ... ble-clash/
Stella explained the reasoning behind the team’s decision to bring Norris in first. “We pitted Lando before Oscar because Lando was the car that was most under pressure when Alonso pitted.
“It wasn’t clear as soon as Alonso would have cleared the AlphaTauri, how fast he would have been. So we wanted to make sure that we had two McLarens ahead of Alonso. So that’s why you go this kind of sequence.”
Lando came out 5s ahead of ALO after the pit.
Silverstone Oscar got it despite being behind and would have been ahead but for the safety car iirc. I don't think McLaren is the RedBull some people are making it out to be.Sevach wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 22:33That's 2 times(that i can recall) that Lando is the car behind and is given the undercut.Seerix wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 19:45speaking of: https://www.racefans.net/2023/09/03/mcl ... ble-clash/
Stella explained the reasoning behind the team’s decision to bring Norris in first. “We pitted Lando before Oscar because Lando was the car that was most under pressure when Alonso pitted.
“It wasn’t clear as soon as Alonso would have cleared the AlphaTauri, how fast he would have been. So we wanted to make sure that we had two McLarens ahead of Alonso. So that’s why you go this kind of sequence.”
Lando came out 5s ahead of ALO after the pit.
Really does calm me right down after a stressful watch, truly the goat!Mostlyeels wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 23:50Stella? I'm not on Twitter, any chance someone could quote it?
Cheers for that. Funny, with all the other stuff going on during the race, I nearly forgot about Lando and Oscar making contact!MCLvamos wrote: ↑04 Sep 2023, 00:16Really does calm me right down after a stressful watch, truly the goat!Mostlyeels wrote: ↑03 Sep 2023, 23:50Stella? I'm not on Twitter, any chance someone could quote it?
They already did… Both times… Not that they have to explain to anyone but the drivers… And even if they are favoring Lando, what’s the problem with that… He is leading in the stats, is the “veteran” in the team and arguably the leader from a driver point of view.
Pretty much every team gives priority to their leading driver on track. The exception is RB and that's because max is a clear #1 on pace. Lando does not have a tenth on piastri for the last few races yet they still give him pitstop strategies as though piastri is tenths per lap off and holding up Norris.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑04 Sep 2023, 01:18They already did… Both times… Not that they have to explain to anyone but the drivers… And even if they are favoring Lando, what’s the problem with that… He is leading in the stats, is the “veteran” in the team and arguably the leader from a driver point of view.
McLaren will also consider whether the decision to pit Norris before Piastri had a bearing on the incident.
“If the contact is due to the fact that there was pressure because of the undercut and so on, then we have something to review. Because it means drivers put the team at risk because of affirming themselves, this is not acceptable.”
Stella explained the reasoning behind the team’s decision to bring Norris in first. “We pitted Lando before Oscar because Lando was the car that was most under pressure when Alonso pitted.
“It wasn’t clear as soon as Alonso would have cleared the AlphaTauri, how fast he would have been. So we wanted to make sure that we had two McLarens ahead of Alonso. So that’s why you go this kind of sequence.”
I guess they are making the decisions they think are the best for the team, I understand the logic behind them if the goal is to have the team score the most amount of points of possible, therefore covering any threats from teams behind you.organic wrote: ↑04 Sep 2023, 01:24Pretty much every team gives priority to their leading driver on track. The exception is RB and that's because max is a clear #1 on pace. Lando does not have a tenth on piastri for the last few races yet they still give him pitstop strategies as though piastri is tenths per lap off and holding up Norris.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑04 Sep 2023, 01:18They already did… Both times… Not that they have to explain to anyone but the drivers… And even if they are favoring Lando, what’s the problem with that… He is leading in the stats, is the “veteran” in the team and arguably the leader from a driver point of view.
I'm just surprised they haven't stopped doing that now that the pace difference is minimal