Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

JamesS wrote:Awful race for lewis, caused by the calamity that is Webber! I can't wait to see if the McLaren can stay competitive though.
It was a great start by HAmilton(he had an even better one in 2007) but it was Hamilton that moved over on Webber ever so slightly that caused Webber's front wing to slice his rear tire. In 2007 it was the dueling BMW's that spun each other and caused a slice into Lou's rear tire that time.

JamesS
JamesS
0
Joined: 22 Jul 2007, 17:11
Location: UK, Manchester

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

Surely with McLaren now having a competitive car, with a solid KERS system, they will retain it for next year. Today showed its true power: A boost for starts.

arporter
arporter
0
Joined: 04 May 2009, 21:21

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

I think KERS would only be retained if a KERS car wins and dominates a race. The only cars who have done that have not even tried using it in racing this year

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

Can anyone shed more light on the comments by the Speed Crew along the lines of

"The new front wing was the first to come out of the CFD department and not the windtunnel dept, and with this one the stopped trying to direct the air to the rear wing but away from the rear of the car"

maybe you guys over in Europe hve access to more info about it from the BBC feed or something

JamesS
JamesS
0
Joined: 22 Jul 2007, 17:11
Location: UK, Manchester

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:Can anyone shed more light on the comments by the Speed Crew along the lines of

"The new front wing was the first to come out of the CFD department and not the windtunnel dept, and with this one the stopped trying to direct the air to the rear wing but away from the rear of the car"

maybe you guys over in Europe hve access to more info about it from the BBC feed or something
I didn't hear them talk about anything specific such as that (BBC), they mentioned lots of updates but that's it.

i70q7m7ghw
i70q7m7ghw
49
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 00:27
Location: ...

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:
JamesS wrote:Awful race for lewis, caused by the calamity that is Webber! I can't wait to see if the McLaren can stay competitive though.
It was a great start by HAmilton(he had an even better one in 2007) but it was Hamilton that moved over on Webber ever so slightly that caused Webber's front wing to slice his rear tire. In 2007 it was the dueling BMW's that spun each other and caused a slice into Lou's rear tire that time.
Other than brake testing someone if someone hits you from behind it's their fault, Webber drove in to the back of Hamilton and punctured his tyre, he was driving like a prat anyway, just look at what he did to Rubens... oh right yeah... he "didn't see him" :roll:

astracrazy
astracrazy
31
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 16:04

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:Can anyone shed more light on the comments by the Speed Crew along the lines of

"The new front wing was the first to come out of the CFD department and not the windtunnel dept, and with this one the stopped trying to direct the air to the rear wing but away from the rear of the car"

maybe you guys over in Europe hve access to more info about it from the BBC feed or something
Perhaps the front wing was always going to be for germany, but they managed to get there hungary updates complete in time (floor etc.)? so the wing was on hold so they could get these completed first?

In terms of where they were directing air, perhaps that was where they were going wrong in the first place?

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

arporter wrote:I think KERS would only be retained if a KERS car wins and dominates a race. The only cars who have done that have not even tried using it in racing this year
KERS will not be here in 2010 because it is an expensive bit of kit that discriminates against the small teams who can't afford the development costs. The only way I can see it being retained is if it delivers big fuel savings to save weight (remember no refueling) and if Ferrari, McL and BMW sell it to the other teams at cut price. Shame though.

BreezyRacer
BreezyRacer
2
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 00:31

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

richard_leeds wrote:
arporter wrote:I think KERS would only be retained if a KERS car wins and dominates a race. The only cars who have done that have not even tried using it in racing this year
KERS will not be here in 2010 because it is an expensive bit of kit that discriminates against the small teams who can't afford the development costs. The only way I can see it being retained is if it delivers big fuel savings to save weight (remember no refueling) and if Ferrari, McL and BMW sell it to the other teams at cut price. Shame though.
I hope it stays but is required. The research has been done, and it makes the racing closer and more exciting. It adds a lot of driver strategy.

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

BreezyRacer wrote:
richard_leeds wrote:
arporter wrote:I think KERS would only be retained if a KERS car wins and dominates a race. The only cars who have done that have not even tried using it in racing this year
KERS will not be here in 2010 because it is an expensive bit of kit that discriminates against the small teams who can't afford the development costs. The only way I can see it being retained is if it delivers big fuel savings to save weight (remember no refueling) and if Ferrari, McL and BMW sell it to the other teams at cut price. Shame though.
I hope it stays but is required. The research has been done, and it makes the racing closer and more exciting. It adds a lot of driver strategy.
Being a requirement 2010 is part of the reason why it is being killed off, idiot teams like Ferrari & Toyota who cant make it work would rather ban it than have to run. But then again even if it was optional those same teams would hate it because they would get their asses handed to them.... KERS is in the same situation as the turbo motors was. Instead of embracing a superior technolgy, idiots like Ferrari would rather ban it and stick with their idiotic V-12's.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:Being a requirement 2010 is part of the reason why it is being killed off, idiot teams like Ferrari & Toyota who cant make it work would rather ban it than have to run. But then again even if it was optional those same teams would hate it because they would get their asses handed to them.... KERS is in the same situation as the turbo motors was. Instead of embracing a superior technolgy, idiots like Ferrari would rather ban it and stick with their idiotic V-12's.
So, why Ferrari still run with KERS if they can't make it?

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

Their system is clearly inferior to the MERC product and has had several high profile failures. They tried running without it and it didnt make the car any faster, Massa even said this weekend that it makes the car at least 3 tenths faster on most tracks.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

ISLAMATRON wrote:Their system is clearly inferior to the MERC product and has had several high profile failures. They tried running without it and it didnt make the car any faster, Massa even said this weekend that it makes the car at least 3 tenths faster on most tracks.
And what about McLaren at Silverstone?

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

siskue2005 wrote:
timbo wrote:
ISLAMATRON wrote:Being a requirement 2010 is part of the reason why it is being killed off, idiot teams like Ferrari & Toyota who cant make it work would rather ban it than have to run. But then again even if it was optional those same teams would hate it because they would get their asses handed to them.... KERS is in the same situation as the turbo motors was. Instead of embracing a superior technolgy, idiots like Ferrari would rather ban it and stick with their idiotic V-12's.
So, why Ferrari still run with KERS if they can't make it?
Dont listen to ISLAMATRON he has a pathological hatred towards Ferrari.
And lets all forget Ferrari is the ONLY team who had 2 Podium with KERS....The highest placed KERS car ON MERIT. :roll:
HEidfeld has the highest finish in a KERS car with a 2nd place in Malaysia.. once again the tifosi try to distort F1 with their rose colored Ferrari bias.

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Vodaphone McLaren Mercedes MP4-24

Post

timbo wrote:
ISLAMATRON wrote:Their system is clearly inferior to the MERC product and has had several high profile failures. They tried running without it and it didnt make the car any faster, Massa even said this weekend that it makes the car at least 3 tenths faster on most tracks.
And what about McLaren at Silverstone?

if you look at these two posts by BAr555
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7038
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7062

you will see that the lack of braking at Silverstone(5.61 sec) is much less than Nurburgring(10.71 sec) and therefore the KERS system would not have had ample time to recharge so McMerc decided to take the opportunity to see if taking off the KERS would improve the weight balance of the car to improve some of their handling deficiencies. It obviously didnt work.