Think most of those are still valid questions that the race pace in Texas hasn't answered.-wkst- wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 10:33We will see what happens in Mexico. I don't see the things as bright.
As aready mentioned, the team had a 2nd set up chance with the pit lane start, at a sprint week that's pure gold.
Then there is the question: is the car really faster (more DF, less drag, etc) or just more driveable (to help STR)?
I think it's a valid point. If all teams changed their set-up after a sprint race presumably they would all improve their performance in the actual race so it's not comparing apples with apples. I think what was encouraging is the deficit from Alonso to Stroll being pretty much nothing, that would imply the upgrades have worked and with further upgrades coming in Mexico maybe they will be back in the fight just behind Red Bull. Equally, they might be nowhere. Aston Martin's performances this season (since the summer) have rarely followed much of a logical pattern (as far as I can see anyway).diffuser wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 13:10Think most of those are still valid questions that the race pace in Texas hasn't answered.-wkst- wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 10:33We will see what happens in Mexico. I don't see the things as bright.
As aready mentioned, the team had a 2nd set up chance with the pit lane start, at a sprint week that's pure gold.
Then there is the question: is the car really faster (more DF, less drag, etc) or just more driveable (to help STR)?
I think they'll take the data from the race and setup the car even better in Mexico, further improving it's performance.
Think the primary reason for the upgrade is for switching from the kick out sidepods to the floor supplying the kick. They evolve the package from there.
Think it's pretty obvious that Alonso's been struggling with controlling the car of late as well, It isn't just for Stroll.
In Normal circumstances, your point is valid, however, AMR specifically wanted to test their upgraded package against the previous one. if they did the set up considering the normal conditions i.e. to gain positions, then the performance in comparision to other cars is not valid.jofs89 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 14:01I think it's a valid point. If all teams changed their set-up after a sprint race presumably they would all improve their performance in the actual race so it's not comparing apples with apples. I think what was encouraging is the deficit from Alonso to Stroll being pretty much nothing, that would imply the upgrades have worked and with further upgrades coming in Mexico maybe they will be back in the fight just behind Red Bull. Equally, they might be nowhere. Aston Martin's performances this season (since the summer) have rarely followed much of a logical pattern (as far as I can see anyway).diffuser wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 13:10Think most of those are still valid questions that the race pace in Texas hasn't answered.-wkst- wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 10:33We will see what happens in Mexico. I don't see the things as bright.
As aready mentioned, the team had a 2nd set up chance with the pit lane start, at a sprint week that's pure gold.
Then there is the question: is the car really faster (more DF, less drag, etc) or just more driveable (to help STR)?
I think they'll take the data from the race and setup the car even better in Mexico, further improving it's performance.
Think the primary reason for the upgrade is for switching from the kick out sidepods to the floor supplying the kick. They evolve the package from there.
Think it's pretty obvious that Alonso's been struggling with controlling the car of late as well, It isn't just for Stroll.
According to this twitter account Stroll's top speed was 3kmh higher than Alonso both in DRS and without DRS, so if that's the case then updates likely took away some of the drag. We'd know for sure if we compared telemetries between the two to see where Stroll would be gaining time. So if anyone has it please post it, would be interesting.-wkst- wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 10:33We will see what happens in Mexico. I don't see the things as bright.
As aready mentioned, the team had a 2nd set up chance with the pit lane start, at a sprint week that's pure gold.
Then there is the question: is the car really faster (more DF, less drag, etc) or just more driveable (to help STR)?
More updates in Mexico?jofs89 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 14:01I think it's a valid point. If all teams changed their set-up after a sprint race presumably they would all improve their performance in the actual race so it's not comparing apples with apples. I think what was encouraging is the deficit from Alonso to Stroll being pretty much nothing, that would imply the upgrades have worked and with further upgrades coming in Mexico maybe they will be back in the fight just behind Red Bull. Equally, they might be nowhere. Aston Martin's performances this season (since the summer) have rarely followed much of a logical pattern (as far as I can see anyway).diffuser wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 13:10Think most of those are still valid questions that the race pace in Texas hasn't answered.-wkst- wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 10:33We will see what happens in Mexico. I don't see the things as bright.
As aready mentioned, the team had a 2nd set up chance with the pit lane start, at a sprint week that's pure gold.
Then there is the question: is the car really faster (more DF, less drag, etc) or just more driveable (to help STR)?
I think they'll take the data from the race and setup the car even better in Mexico, further improving it's performance.
Think the primary reason for the upgrade is for switching from the kick out sidepods to the floor supplying the kick. They evolve the package from there.
Think it's pretty obvious that Alonso's been struggling with controlling the car of late as well, It isn't just for Stroll.
I disagree with that statement. Fact...look how they nailed the Qatar car setup with no FP in Texas. Teams coming with minor or no updates aren't gonna have setup issues. Also it wasn't that both drivers had just FP1 to get the setup right, it was more like they had just a few laps in FP1.collindsilva wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 14:09In Normal circumstances, your point is valid, however, AMR specifically wanted to test their upgraded package against the previous one. if they did the set up considering the normal conditions i.e. to gain positions, then the performance in comparision to other cars is not valid.jofs89 wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 14:01I think it's a valid point. If all teams changed their set-up after a sprint race presumably they would all improve their performance in the actual race so it's not comparing apples with apples. I think what was encouraging is the deficit from Alonso to Stroll being pretty much nothing, that would imply the upgrades have worked and with further upgrades coming in Mexico maybe they will be back in the fight just behind Red Bull. Equally, they might be nowhere. Aston Martin's performances this season (since the summer) have rarely followed much of a logical pattern (as far as I can see anyway).diffuser wrote: ↑23 Oct 2023, 13:10
Think most of those are still valid questions that the race pace in Texas hasn't answered.
I think they'll take the data from the race and setup the car even better in Mexico, further improving it's performance.
Think the primary reason for the upgrade is for switching from the kick out sidepods to the floor supplying the kick. They evolve the package from there.
Think it's pretty obvious that Alonso's been struggling with controlling the car of late as well, It isn't just for Stroll.