And you think those are 100% trustworthy.
Whose speculating now with that last line of yours. You and others are what is called a kangaroo court. You have no evidence and only hearsay but you will find him guilty and sentence him already.dialtone wrote: ↑10 Feb 2024, 22:16You are thinking as a fan rather than as a company director. Nobody owes you any information and you have no knowledge of internal company processes or why they work a certain way.
Speculation is only going to hurt you. After all that has happened so far, the chances things will go back to normal, regardless of anything, are slim.
Out of all the speculations in the thread, that Horner might come out of this not as excited to work for RB, even if nothing is found, seems a pretty safe bet. The rest about criminal and stuff, nobody talked about stuff being criminal so I don't know why you are going there.carisi2k wrote: ↑11 Feb 2024, 03:46Whose speculating now with that last line of yours. You and others are what is called a kangaroo court. You have no evidence and only hearsay but you will find him guilty and sentence him already.dialtone wrote: ↑10 Feb 2024, 22:16You are thinking as a fan rather than as a company director. Nobody owes you any information and you have no knowledge of internal company processes or why they work a certain way.
Speculation is only going to hurt you. After all that has happened so far, the chances things will go back to normal, regardless of anything, are slim.
If anything criminal happened then the police would be involved and if RB had anything at all on Horner in regards to this harassment then he would already be gone. If all the scuttlebutt the media, websites and youtube channels were true then RB shouldn't have any issues at all in firing Christian.
The Police only get involved if someone wants to press charges.carisi2k wrote: ↑11 Feb 2024, 03:46If anything criminal happened then the police would be involved and if RB had anything at all on Horner in regards to this harassment then he would already be gone. If all the scuttlebutt the media, websites and youtube channels were true then RB shouldn't have any issues at all in firing Christian.
Unless someone proves the official information from RB press office is incorrect, like a whistleblower, they are the only trustworthy source in their case.
Because historically the accused has always been honest and open in press releases, never self-serving (!!).
I don't know what is that you find funny. For once, it helps to read the post, if you didn't do it already. When an organization releases press information, it's not the "accused" that is coming and telling you. I don't think I need to elaborate further.zeroday wrote: ↑11 Feb 2024, 10:22Because historically the accused has always been honest and open in press releases, never self-serving (!!).
Sorry, not sure if you're being sarcastic or serious. So, i have to assume it's the latter
Can't believe this has to be said but, the press has their purpose. Let them do their job. Yes, they can get it wrong or there are rags that lie for political reasons or for the clicks (eg Fox News in usa). But there are reputable sources.
zeroday wrote: ↑11 Feb 2024, 10:22Because historically the accused has always been honest and open in press releases, never self-serving (!!).
Sorry, not sure if you're being sarcastic or serious. So, i have to assume it's the latter
Can't believe this has to be said but, the press has their purpose. Let them do their job. Yes, they can get it wrong or there are rags that lie for political reasons or for the clicks (eg Fox News in usa). But there are reputable sources.
There is only one party here we know has the information from all parties, RB GmbH, that alone makes them the most credible source until further notice. And RB are not the accused, that would be Horner. Get the basic facts right.Because historically the tabloids has always been honest and open in their articles, never self-serving (!!).
Sorry, not sure if you're being sarcastic or serious. So, i have to assume it's the latter
So far the RB Press Release is the only communication worth reading on the subject it has the advantage of being factual.
No, to you they are, not for everyone, many times media fill in the gaps that the press reports keep hidden. Things that you may not like, but are factual.
Can the "factual media information" that you refer to, stands in a court of law as evidence? If yes, then it's factual whether anyone likes it or not. Otherwise, it's worth garbage that a few want to believe because of their own biases.
Let's not mix technical information sharing, which is actually sharing knowledge, to using yellow journalism to corroborate acts of individuals that aren't apparent or clear and call it factual. Technical Knowledge is not absolute, need not have to be and can build as you share, obviously.
Explain to me line by line what isn't factual in the RB Press release?